Author Archive

Is a Star Trek-Style Tricorder Here?

Monday, May 16th, 2016

When Dr. Sonny Kohli was volunteering in Haiti in 2010 he found himself in a hospital that lacked basic diagnostic equipment.

As he worked to fix a broken EKG unit with duct tape and wires, he asked a simple question: Why don’t I have a smartphone-connected EKG?

Tricorders, used in the Star Trek universe, refer to the device’s three primary functions: sensing, computing and recording. To get one with light and sound effects, (but without anything in the way of a useful function), one only needs to order online.

However, real life is now catching up to the future as depicted in the 1960s. Dr. Kohli is turning science fiction into reality as the chief medical officer of Cloud DX Inc., a Kitchener, Ontario-based startup with the world’s first working tricorder-like health device.

With such promising technology, it’s no surprise Cloud DX has been chosen as one of 17 Canadian companies taking part in the C100’s upcoming 48hrs in the Valley program.

So what’s being said in social media about Cloud DX?

techPortolio_chiclet_Cloud1_May15 (1)

 

Terms like “Star Trek” and “tricorder” appear thanks to this article by Communitech, which was shared by an influential account, Invest Ontario.  

The terms “Qualcomm” and “Xprize” appear in the discussion because the device, called Vitaliti, is one of seven finalists in Qualcomm’s $10 million Tricorder Xprize.

One of many Xprize competitions, the tricorder prize challenges entrepreneurs to create a portable, wireless device that can diagnose 13 conditions and real-time monitor 5 health vital signs without intervention from a doctor.

Watch Dr. Kohli talk about the competition and why devices like Vitaliti are so important:

What Do You Call a Canadian Unicorn?

Thursday, May 12th, 2016

The ups and downs of unicorn valuations have dominated the Twitter conversation around tech for much of the past year, both in Canada and elsewhere. How does Canada differentiate itself when referring to startups valued at $1 billion or more?

The mighty narwhal.

While this carnivorous whale – distinguished by its single tusk – is an actual creature as opposed to a mythical one, try to find someone who’s seen a narwhal in the flesh. The animal’s scarcity makes it an appropriate metaphor.

There have been more than 1.8 million impressions from 175 mentions by 124 users between October 31 and April 30. Here’s what the conversation looks like:

 

techPortolio_chiclet_Cloud2_May_12

 

Narwhals Are the Unicorns of the North

 

Carl Franzen, Online director at Popular Science, likely found that paragraph of text in a syndicated version of this story from the Canadian Press: Evolving B.C. Tech Startups Threaten to disrupt ‘dinosaur’ industries. Indeed, one of Canada’s most famous unicorns narwhals is Vancouver, B.C.-based Hootsuite.

Who are the other narwhals? Check out Visual Capitalist’s handy infographic from October 2015:

Unicorns & VCs

Unicorns haven’t been completely sidelined in Canada, though. The unicorn conversation often includes talk of venture capital. One example is this tweet from Startup Canada, which appears in the Twitter conversation:

The episode featured here is an interview with David Nault, a principal at  iNovia. You can listen to it here:

[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/242734638″ params=”auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true” width=”100%” height=”450″ iframe=”true” /]

VCs are not only talking about the industry on podcasts. Another story that bubbled up in the Twitter conversation was this PE Hub Network’s article on 2016 predictions for Canadian tech startups and venture capital.

Written by Jim Orlando, the piece explores IPOs, virtual reality and augmented reality, and an increase in activity from U.S. venture investors.  

For more on startup monikers, check out our piece here on how the cockroach crawled into tech sector parlance.

Under Armour Leverages IBM’s Watson to Challenge Fitbit

Thursday, May 12th, 2016

One of the biggest brands in athletic wear is charging into wearable tech with a pack of products and a pair of tech industry partnerships. Under Armour is leveraging artificial intelligence to give its offering an edge over competing products from Nike and Fitbit. 

Retailing for $400, HealthBox is a trio consisting of a Fitbit-like band, a digital scale and a heart-rate monitor. And UA isn’t starting from zero in its effort to tap demand for wearables.

Over the last few years, the company has snagged three massive online fitness communities: Endomondo, MapMyFitness and MyFitnessPal. They now control the largest online wellness-focused ecosystem, at 165 million users. And it’s what HealthBox can do with all that data that makes this a compelling package.

Under Armour partnered with HTC to develop the hardware and a smartphone app called UA Record, which ties all the products together. The UA fitness tracker is cleanly designed, made of a rubber-like material with a LED display. The heart rate monitor is constructed of durable band and the monitor glows when it detects a heartbeat. The scale measures weight and BMI. All the data from the three devices talk to each other and transfer data via Bluetooth to UA Record.

Cognitive Coaching

Under Armour’s partnership with IBM and the “cognitive coaching” potential of Watson differentiates HealthBox from the competition. By feeding nutrition, training, and sleep information into Watson, it’s “able to understand data in large volumes, make recommendations, and continuously learn,” says Chris Glodé, Under Armour’s VP digital, connected fitness. “The more data UA Record inputs, the smarter Watson becomes.”

UA has experimented with Internet of Things in the past. They built a sensor-laden compression T-shirt back in 2011 for the NFL Combine, where college stars worked out for prospective pro teams. The shirt provided raw data on acceleration, speed and heart rate for scouts to pour over. HealthBox and the partnership with IBM means that the Record app will be able to send the data to Watson to disambiguate.

Watson’s Cognitive Coaching uses a comparative model, grouping users based on criteria like age, gender and activity level in order to provide training and recovery recommendations.

And the experience will get richer over time.

“As you record more data and as more data is recorded across the community, the smarter the insights will become,”  Glodé says.

How Much is Cognitive Technology Helping the Raptors?

Tuesday, May 10th, 2016

A year ago the Raptors were victims of an unexpected 4-0 sweep in the first round of the NBA playoffs at the hands of the lower-ranked Washington Wizards. They’re now tied with the Miami Heat 2-2 in a grueling best-of-seven series, which will see the eventual winners play LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers in the Eastern Conference finals.

Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment, which owns the Raptors, announced in February that it would use cognitive analysis provided by IBM’s Watson technology platform, noting that Watson would be used mostly for talent acquisition.

Is cognitive technology one of the factors behind the improved performance?

It’s difficult to answer that question because the Raptors consider the IBM agreement to be a competitive advantage, and are therefore mum on this subject. With a head coach as tight lipped as Dwane Casey, this is hardly surprising.

There’s only been one addition to the team since IBM and the Raptors announced the use of Watson, so the application of cognitive technology might not be a factor unless they’re using Watson’s analysis for more than recruitment.

Unstructured Data

Traditional analytics-based approaches require data to be tightly structured and presented in a predictable format. Watson is different in that it makes sense of large volumes of unstructured data — video footage, news articles, scientific journals, social media, as examples —  which a few years ago would have required a human to interpret.

And the machine learns. The more data it’s fed, the better its predictions become. Each suggestion is even accompanied by a confidence level rating.

In professional sports, Watson can be used to determine, based on any number of parameters, if a player will be a good fit for a team’s social dynamics. Artificial intelligence can quickly identify, for example, a player who will fill the needs for a particular position, work within salary restrictions, and play well with teammates.

With two crucial contracts — Bismack Biyombo and DeMar DeRozan — on the table at the end of this season, a salary cap to manage and four first-round draft picks over the next two years, the next incarnation of the Raptors lineup is far from clear.

While it’s tough to gauge Watson’s impact on the current season, the platform is likely learning much as it analyzes players on and off the court. Whatever the case, fans should expect the big data addition to play a bigger role in the Raptors’ strategy going forward.

Why Canada’s Tech Scene is Worth Getting Excited About

Tuesday, May 10th, 2016

Editor’s Note: This piece was re-printed from a LinkedIn Pulse item with permission from the writer, Jeff Booth, who is Co-Founder, President and CEO of BuildDirect. The original version lives here

Earlier this year, Microsoft added its fourth development office to downtown Vancouver, joining a who’s who of U.S. tech names that have set up shop in Vancouver in recent years, including Amazon.com, Salesforce.com and Facebook.

It’s tempting to say the city is blossoming into Silicon Valley North but, to truly earn that title, Vancouver — or any other Canadian city for that matter — must build its own ecosystem of successful, home-grown tech companies. In fact, we’ll know Vancouver has made it when tech companies from here are setting up outposts in other places.

Of late, it’s become fashionable to point out all the reasons this will never happen. Canadian tech naysayers point to troubles finding experienced senior management, a shortage of funding and a university system not pumping out enough research and engineering talent as reasons Canada will never compete with hubs like California and Washington. Some of those critiques are valid, but do they predict the future or do they just describe the present?

techPortfolio_Quote_May_10

Early on when building BuildDirect, I was asked to sit on a Conference Board of Canada roundtable on boosting tech innovation, comprised of leaders in industry, academia and government. Although the group was set up to help Canada win, the discussion always felt like an endless circle of laments: why entrepreneurs sell out too early, why Canada doesn’t celebrate our successes, etc. What frustrated me most was it seemed everyone got it backwards.

It’s the entrepreneur who starts the whole cycle by having a vision bigger than himself and carrying it out. That act, the vision of a different future, is what creates the value that attracts the rest of the ecosystem.

The reality is these are early days for aspiring technology centres like Vancouver, Toronto or Waterloo. It’s easy to look to established ecosystems and see countless shortcomings in comparison: there isn’t a giant anchor company like Google to spin off ideas and talent; soaring housing prices and border bureaucracy sway top talent from moving; start-up capital can be in short supply.

But that’s a near-sighted approach. Looking at the bigger picture, Vancouver and other Canadian cities hold enormous promise and advantages even Silicon Valley didn’t have in its infancy. We should be looking to leverage those advantages instead of wallowing in our shortcomings. The more apt comparison for Vancouver isn’t the Seattle or Northern California hubs of today, but where those centres were at their beginnings.

From Prunes to Electronics

A century ago, the Santa Clara Valley’s export specialty was a plum variety that could be processed into prunes. In fact, it wasn’t until 1971 when the Silicon Valley moniker was first used. The area’s technology industry began with World War II-era government investment into radar and electronics research at Stanford University. More government money flowed throughout the Cold War to the Valley and to Massachusetts’ Route 128, fostering the growth of now-famous companies like Hewlett-Packard and Xerox PARC. Seattle’s smaller hub was built around companies like Boeing.

Often overlooked is the fact that Silicon Valley’s tech sector didn’t overtake Massachusetts in profits and innovation until the 1980s — proving that a smaller, weaker player can grow and win. Even then its economic output was a fraction of what it is now. It’s easy to see the economic powerhouse that Silicon Valley has become, but it’s worth remembering the long road it took to get there and the many failed companies it left along the way. The vibrant ecosystem we see now is a byproduct of those struggles.

It’s also important to point out the role that determined, focused individuals played in these early histories, when success was anything but a surefire bet. Silicon Valley literally began in a Palo Alto garage rented by Stanford University graduates Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard, who started the Hewlett-Packard Company in 1939 with $538 in working capital and a used Sears Craftsman drill press.

Elon Musk, Stewart Butterfield

Canada does not lack people with great ideas and grand vision. It’s often overlooked that one of the most esteemed innovators of the 21st century, Elon Musk – the mind behind PayPal, SpaceX and Tesla – is a Canadian citizen and attended Queen’s University in Kingston before ultimately moving to the U.S. Vancouverite Stewart Butterfield created the original photo-sharing site Flickr in the mid 2000s and went on to build the office social platform Slack, now headquartered in San Francisco and valued around $4 billion.

At the same time, dedicated entrepreneurs can achieve great success within Vancouver’s ecosystem, and help the ecosystem as a whole flourish. This is the difficult path that Silicon Valley’s founders took, and that local companies like D-Wave Systems, Hootsuite, Shoes.com, Mobify and my own company are committed to taking. We might have reached a steeper growth trajectory by moving to the U.S., but wanted to build something great here.

Yes, there’s room for improvement on a variety of fronts north of the border. We need to ramp up investments in education, loosen red tape for importing talent and build up our funding infrastructure. But true entrepreneurs see opportunities where others see problems. They go where everybody isn’t.

In that sense, there are more opportunities in Vancouver in 2016 than in the Silicon Valley of today, precisely because not everybody has seen them. Investment opportunities here are under-exploited compared to the sky-high valuations seen in more prominent centres, a fact that many of smartest (and best funded) VCs are clueing into, bringing new sources of funding to the city. Not all home-grown companies will succeed, but some will — and the payoff is going to be more than just money.

Self-sustaining Engine

We’ve seen that building a technology hub takes time, resources, and innovation, but those investments combine to create a self-sustaining engine for economic growth and advancement. The sum is far greater than the parts.

Vancouver is a young ecosystem, but it’s a closely knit community whose leaders reach out and support one another. It can achieve greatness if it holds to the kind of faith that built Silicon Valley from its humble start. And the same goes for Waterloo, Toronto and the other emerging and established tech hubs in Canada. The potential is, in fact, enormous, if we can see beyond the early hurdles.

There will always be shouts from the sidelines from people who say things can’t be done. But, to borrow a line from Teddy Roosevelt, the credit belongs with he who “spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly.” This may seem melodramatic, but for entrepreneurs dedicated to building a tech ecosystem in Canada, business is truly more than just business. This is a project fueled as much by passion as by profit, and one that promises extraordinary things in the years ahead.

When did the Cockroach Crawl into Tech Sector Parlance?

Monday, May 2nd, 2016

With the glitter of tech unicorns fading, venture capitalists and investors are looking for decidedly less glamorous startups to back — and those companies have a name to match. Cockroaches.

A cockroach isn’t as clearly defined as a unicorn, which are startups with pre-IPO valuations of $1 billion or more. The Irish Times describes the tech cockroach as “a startup consisting of hard-working founders who keep survival at the core of their business strategy.”

The cockroach has also been described as having the ability to quickly become frugal and run lean, although there are no financial parameters for that definition. David Cummings offered a list of characteristics that includes “little-to-no salaries for the entrepreneurs”.

So where did this term first gain traction online?

The earliest published reference we could find was from Dave McClure, founding partner at venture fund and seed accelerator 500 Startups in a Wired UK article from 2013. In the piece, McClure calls out entrepreneurs for “trying to build audiences without knowing how to monetise them.” The article goes on:

[McClure] “said that many people building startups think that engineering and design are the critical factors as to whether their business is successful. ‘I would challenge that. What’s missing in most startups is scalable, cash-flow profitable (costs you less to acquire the customer than you generate in revenue) distribution.’”

Traction with SlideShare

A SlideShare from McClure posted in June 2015 is the next reference to cockroaches, which has been shared 212 times across LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and Google+, according to Buzzsumo data. In the presentation, he reiterates his message from two years earlier that startups need to be lean and run “simpler, faster, smarter, cheaper.”

Three months later, in October 2015, Flickr co-founder Caterina Fake picks up the term for her column in Medium called “The Age of the Cockroach”.

In her piece, Fake points to the then-looming funding crisis as the reason why unicorns will be replaced by cockroaches. She then offers this advice: “Companies that want to outlast the coming funding crisis will need to move fast, cut costs, and plan for a future without much money in it. They will have to lay off staff, move their pricy downtown office to the unsexy exurbs, pivot into revenue-generating business models, kill projects going nowhere, live with less.”

For the next six months, as investment funds continue their write downs and venture capitalists begin talking openly about a shift in their approaches, Fake’s column spread online. It has collected over 8000 shares across social media channels, according to Buzzsumo.

Finally, on February 11, 2016, the term cockroach surfaced in Business Insider‘s “Startups are realizing there’s no Plan B: They have to survive the bad times like ‘cockroaches’“.

We expect the term to continue resonating as VC funding tightens. Read Cockroaches Rise, Unicorns Fall as Venture Capital Plays Moneyball — our own take on this new phase in the tech startup space.

Where Did the Term Cockroach Come From?

Monday, May 2nd, 2016

With the glitter of tech unicorns fading, venture capitalists and investors are looking for decidedly less glamorous startups to back — and those companies have a name to match. Cockroaches.

A cockroach isn’t as clearly defined as a unicorn, startups with pre-IPO valuations of $1 billion or more. Instead, a cockroach, as the Irish Times described earlier this year, “refers to a startup consisting of hard-working founders who keep survival at the core of their business strategy.” It’s also been described as having the ability to quickly become frugal and run lean, although there are no financial parameters to that definition. David Cummings offered a list of characteristics that includes “little-to-no salaries for the entrepreneurs”.

So where did this skin-crawling term first gain traction online?

The earliest published reference we could find was from Dave McClure of 500 Startups in a Wired UK article from 2013. In the piece, McClure calls out entrepreneurs for “trying to build audiences without knowing how to monetize them.”

The article goes on: “He said that many people building startups think that engineering and design are the critical factors as to whether their business is successful. “I would challenge that. What’s missing in most startups is scalable, cash-flow profitable (costs you less to acquire the customer than you generate in revenue) distribution.””

A slideshare from McClure posted in June 2015 is the next reference to cockroaches, which has been shared 212 times across LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and Google+, according to Buzzsumo. In the presentation, he reiterates his message from two years earlier, that startups need to be lean and run “simpler, faster, smarter, cheaper.”

Three months later, in October 2015, Flickr co-founder Caterina Fake picks up the term for her column in Medium called “The Age of the Cockroach”.

In it, Fake points to the then looming funding crisis as the reason why unicorns will be replaced by cockroaches. She then offers this advice: “Companies that want to outlast the coming funding crisis will need to move fast, cut costs, and plan for a future without much money in it. They will have to lay off staff, move their pricy downtown office to the unsexy exurbs, pivot into revenue-generating business models, kill projects going nowhere, live with less.”

For the next four months, as investment funds continue their write downs and venture capitalists begin talking openly about a shift in their approaches, Fake’s column spread online. It has collected over 8000 shares across social media channels, according to Buzzsumo.

Finally, on February 11, 2016, the term cockroach scuttled its way into a mainstream media publication. It’s Business Insider‘s “Startups are realizing there’s no Plan B: They have to survive the bad times like ‘cockroaches’“. 

Fans Getting Closer Than Ever to Tour Action Thanks to the IoT

Wednesday, April 27th, 2016

As the official technology partner for the Tour de France, Dimension Data is changing the spectator experience of the world’s most prestigious cycling race with the IoT. Using IBM’s InfoSphere Streams analytics platform, Dimension Data monitored the real-time geolocational data of almost 200 riders over 21 days.

Every bicycle in the race was equipped with GPS sensors and a sophisticated relay system that transmitted data to apps, websites and broadcasters, giving fans and media the ability to track a rider’s progress throughout the race. The experience was no longer limited to a manual process that involved radios, stopwatches, and chasing riders on motorcycles to read the numbers on their shirts.

Dimension Data’s IoT solution provided a “positional fix every second, the latitude and longitude and the speed of every single rider,” IBM Asia Pacific’s Big Data Technical Leader Chris Howard told ReadWrite. “And from that raw data, we then did lots of things to determine their journey so far, how far they’d progressed, the ranking of the riders, the distance and times between all of the riders.”

In the future, a related IBM technology known as Quarks will provide cycling fans, broadcasters and team strategists deeper insights during the Tour. Quarks is an open source platform that lets developers create IoT applications to analyze data on the edge of their networks.

Howard believes that sensitive information such as “power output data, cycling cadence, pedalling cadence, respiration, [and] heart rate” could be gathered and used in a competitive nature.

To read more about how IoT is disrupting the Tour de France, please click here.

Halliburton Chooses IBM Cloud to Help Cut Oilfield Development Costs

Wednesday, April 20th, 2016

Halliburton, the global oilfield services company that works with many of the world’s largest oil and gas players, has adopted IBM Cloud to run more detailed reservoir simulations, which may help struggling producers cut costs.

Record low oil prices, caused by strong output among oil producing nations amid weaker global demand, have put pressure on producers of the fossil fuel to lower extraction costs. Crude oil prices have fallen by more than half in the past two years, and talks between OPEC and Russia aimed at curbing production have stalled.

“Using high performance computing of the IBM Cloud, we can run very detailed simulation models and evaluate a wide range of field development options, which translates into better field development plans for our clients and a competitive advantage for our business,” Steven Knabe, a Halliburton Consulting director, said in an IBM statement.

The world’s biggest oil companies are expected to report their worst quarterly earnings in more than a decade because the industry’s cost-cutting efforts haven’t yet offset the decline in crude prices, Bloomberg reported. This adds pressure on producers to leverage technology to help plan reservoir development in a way that maximizes returns.

Like many industries, oil and gas companies are turning to technical advances available through cloud computing, data analytics, and machine learning to boost productivity.

And there is room for growth. “While some oil and gas companies have invested in their analytics capabilities, many struggle to get their arms around this powerful new opportunity,” consulting firm Bain & Company said in a report titled “Big Data analytics in oil and gas.”

Adopting IBM Cloud technology allows Halliburton to “quickly run hundreds of simulation cases to forecast the possible behavior of complex oil and gas fields,” according to the IBM statement, which doesn’t disclose terms for the company’s usage of IBM Cloud.

IBM markets a range of solutions for enhancing production, improving processing efficiency, and optimizing global operations for the oil and gas industry.

Halliburton Consulting specializes in formulating development plans for both new and mature fields.

VOX: Non-compete Enforcement Hobbles Tech Ecosystems

Tuesday, April 19th, 2016

Silicon Valley has soared on the strength of tech innovation while the “Massachusetts miracle” fizzled, Vox writes, in a piece that analyses how non-compete agreements in employment contracts have affected tech startup ecosystems.

California has gone further than other states to nullify such clauses. They’re not just void in the sunshine state; employers can be held liable for refusing to hire someone for not agreeing to sign one. The unfettered job-hopping freedom that results has helped to support companies like Intel, Tesla and YouTube.

In contrast, Boston-area ventures Digital Equipment Corporation and Wang Laboratories, behemoths in their day, are gone. (You might want to keep the volume down when you hit the Wang Labs link.)

However, the Bay area’s edge may get blunted.  

“Most states have laws like Massachusetts, and recently policymakers from Massachusetts to Hawaii have been considering reforms to noncompete agreements,” Vox says.

That might give Boston, as well as other areas boasting institutional strength in academia and venture capital, a chance to catch up.