Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category

Most-Read Stories About Funding for Canadian Startups

Monday, May 16th, 2016

One year has made a big difference in terms of funding for tech startups as unicorn worship has given way to cockroach austerity. While tech ecosystems don’t seem to be heading for a collapse along the lines of 2000, the money isn’t flowing like it was in mid-2015.

Funding for U.S. startups in this year’s first quarter fell 25 percent from the fourth quarter of 2015 to $13.9 billion, the largest quarterly decline on record since the dot-com bust, according to (warning: paywall) data from Dow Jones VentureSource. The numbers of Q1 deals hit a four-year low of 884.

Also in the first quarter, the median value of U.S. startups plummeted to $18.5 million after hitting a peak of $61.5 million in last year’s third quarter, according to the same report. Comparable data aren’t available for Canada, but the trend is clear.

techPortfolio_Fact_May_15

Still, the weak patch doesn’t mean the well has gone dry. Here are some of the most-read stories of the past month about funding for Canadian startups:

Vancouver’s Bench Raises $20 Million Series B Round

You might well use Bench for in your own organization, so this is good news for the future. Ian Crosby, CEO of Bench, says that the Series B funding will remove constraints and allow them to “undergo rapid employee growth.”

Thirdshelf Moves Out Of Stealth Mode After Raising $800,000, partnering with Lightspeed

Meanwhile, you’ve probably already used ThirdShelf without realizing it. ThirdShelf’s USP is that they allow independent retailers to retain their own customer data, rather than making them partner or share their lists. If you want a glimpse of the future of the checkout line, the article also talks about ThirdShelf’s work with developing bots that can gauge how and when to engage each customer.

With New Seed Funding, Hockeystick Looks To Compete With CB Insights For Startup Data

More than just the latest contender for ‘most Canadian startup name ever’, Hockeystick helps link startups with their investors, enabling a free flow of financial data. This interview with Raymond Luk, the company’s founder, shows how startups need to get over with their hesitance to share, and the advantage Hockeystick has over competitors that rely on surveys alone.

24 Canadian Startups Raised $152 Million in April

Lastly, here’s a list of hard data. Startups from Vancouver to the Maritimes (that’s PEI and Fredericton in there) are pulling in a good deal of angel and venture capital. Topping the list is Etobicoke-based Flipp at $61 million, who create digital versions of flyers and in their well-rated app.

Is a Star Trek-Style Tricorder Here?

Monday, May 16th, 2016

When Dr. Sonny Kohli was volunteering in Haiti in 2010 he found himself in a hospital that lacked basic diagnostic equipment.

As he worked to fix a broken EKG unit with duct tape and wires, he asked a simple question: Why don’t I have a smartphone-connected EKG?

Tricorders, used in the Star Trek universe, refer to the device’s three primary functions: sensing, computing and recording. To get one with light and sound effects, (but without anything in the way of a useful function), one only needs to order online.

However, real life is now catching up to the future as depicted in the 1960s. Dr. Kohli is turning science fiction into reality as the chief medical officer of Cloud DX Inc., a Kitchener, Ontario-based startup with the world’s first working tricorder-like health device.

With such promising technology, it’s no surprise Cloud DX has been chosen as one of 17 Canadian companies taking part in the C100’s upcoming 48hrs in the Valley program.

So what’s being said in social media about Cloud DX?

techPortolio_chiclet_Cloud1_May15 (1)

 

Terms like “Star Trek” and “tricorder” appear thanks to this article by Communitech, which was shared by an influential account, Invest Ontario.  

The terms “Qualcomm” and “Xprize” appear in the discussion because the device, called Vitaliti, is one of seven finalists in Qualcomm’s $10 million Tricorder Xprize.

One of many Xprize competitions, the tricorder prize challenges entrepreneurs to create a portable, wireless device that can diagnose 13 conditions and real-time monitor 5 health vital signs without intervention from a doctor.

Watch Dr. Kohli talk about the competition and why devices like Vitaliti are so important:

WIRED: Magic Leap Stands Out Among Giants in the Artificial Reality Race

Friday, May 13th, 2016

Artificial reality is making waves throughout the tech industry, and Magic Leap has made one of the biggest splashes in terms of financing. The company has secured what may be the largest C-round in history: $793.5 million.

techPortfolio_Fact_May_12

Fort Lauderdale, FL-based Magic Leap will need to spend wisely to compete with the tech giants of the west coast and Asia.

A recent profile of Magic Leap in Wired noted that “Facebook, Google, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Sony, Samsung—have whole groups dedicated to artificial reality, and they’re hiring more engineers daily. Facebook alone has over 400 people working on VR.”

By 2020, the augmented and virtual reality markets are expected to be worth about $150 billion. This is creating hardware and software development opportunities for startups in just about every industry and facet of life, from film to education to day-to-day office administration.

But the potential applications could spill over combine with other emerging technologies. As we enter virtual worlds, the demand for IoT devices and smart-connected spaces could increase. The combination of virtual space and IoT tools has the potential to revolutionize industries such as skilled trades, healthcare, and tourism.

As startups plan for the future, it is worth considering if virtual reality will disrupt their business and how technologies like Magic Leap might impact them. Until Magic Leap unveils what it’s hiding, the true extent of its impact can’t be measured, but until then, it doesn’t hurt to imagine.  

Under Armour Leverages IBM’s Watson to Challenge Fitbit

Thursday, May 12th, 2016

One of the biggest brands in athletic wear is charging into wearable tech with a pack of products and a pair of tech industry partnerships. Under Armour is leveraging artificial intelligence to give its offering an edge over competing products from Nike and Fitbit. 

Retailing for $400, HealthBox is a trio consisting of a Fitbit-like band, a digital scale and a heart-rate monitor. And UA isn’t starting from zero in its effort to tap demand for wearables.

Over the last few years, the company has snagged three massive online fitness communities: Endomondo, MapMyFitness and MyFitnessPal. They now control the largest online wellness-focused ecosystem, at 165 million users. And it’s what HealthBox can do with all that data that makes this a compelling package.

Under Armour partnered with HTC to develop the hardware and a smartphone app called UA Record, which ties all the products together. The UA fitness tracker is cleanly designed, made of a rubber-like material with a LED display. The heart rate monitor is constructed of durable band and the monitor glows when it detects a heartbeat. The scale measures weight and BMI. All the data from the three devices talk to each other and transfer data via Bluetooth to UA Record.

Cognitive Coaching

Under Armour’s partnership with IBM and the “cognitive coaching” potential of Watson differentiates HealthBox from the competition. By feeding nutrition, training, and sleep information into Watson, it’s “able to understand data in large volumes, make recommendations, and continuously learn,” says Chris Glodé, Under Armour’s VP digital, connected fitness. “The more data UA Record inputs, the smarter Watson becomes.”

UA has experimented with Internet of Things in the past. They built a sensor-laden compression T-shirt back in 2011 for the NFL Combine, where college stars worked out for prospective pro teams. The shirt provided raw data on acceleration, speed and heart rate for scouts to pour over. HealthBox and the partnership with IBM means that the Record app will be able to send the data to Watson to disambiguate.

Watson’s Cognitive Coaching uses a comparative model, grouping users based on criteria like age, gender and activity level in order to provide training and recovery recommendations.

And the experience will get richer over time.

“As you record more data and as more data is recorded across the community, the smarter the insights will become,”  Glodé says.

How Much is Cognitive Technology Helping the Raptors?

Tuesday, May 10th, 2016

A year ago the Raptors were victims of an unexpected 4-0 sweep in the first round of the NBA playoffs at the hands of the lower-ranked Washington Wizards. They’re now tied with the Miami Heat 2-2 in a grueling best-of-seven series, which will see the eventual winners play LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers in the Eastern Conference finals.

Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment, which owns the Raptors, announced in February that it would use cognitive analysis provided by IBM’s Watson technology platform, noting that Watson would be used mostly for talent acquisition.

Is cognitive technology one of the factors behind the improved performance?

It’s difficult to answer that question because the Raptors consider the IBM agreement to be a competitive advantage, and are therefore mum on this subject. With a head coach as tight lipped as Dwane Casey, this is hardly surprising.

There’s only been one addition to the team since IBM and the Raptors announced the use of Watson, so the application of cognitive technology might not be a factor unless they’re using Watson’s analysis for more than recruitment.

Unstructured Data

Traditional analytics-based approaches require data to be tightly structured and presented in a predictable format. Watson is different in that it makes sense of large volumes of unstructured data — video footage, news articles, scientific journals, social media, as examples —  which a few years ago would have required a human to interpret.

And the machine learns. The more data it’s fed, the better its predictions become. Each suggestion is even accompanied by a confidence level rating.

In professional sports, Watson can be used to determine, based on any number of parameters, if a player will be a good fit for a team’s social dynamics. Artificial intelligence can quickly identify, for example, a player who will fill the needs for a particular position, work within salary restrictions, and play well with teammates.

With two crucial contracts — Bismack Biyombo and DeMar DeRozan — on the table at the end of this season, a salary cap to manage and four first-round draft picks over the next two years, the next incarnation of the Raptors lineup is far from clear.

While it’s tough to gauge Watson’s impact on the current season, the platform is likely learning much as it analyzes players on and off the court. Whatever the case, fans should expect the big data addition to play a bigger role in the Raptors’ strategy going forward.

Investors Weigh in on Programming Language Choice

Thursday, May 5th, 2016

As a startup, your choice of programming language may not be top of mind for potential investors, but it can affect funding potential under some circumstances. We asked tech investors about factors to consider when making that choice.

For Federico Wengi, a venture capital associate with Paua Ventures in Berlin, startups should consider their comfort level with the language, where the market is going and if the language they choose is the best one to reach their goals. While VCs usually don’t try to change decisions around programming languages, the way programs are written could affect investment decisions.

“If we don’t like what we see in the tech [due diligence], we walk away,” Wengi said. “It is important that we can establish proof that the team has built a sustainable backbone of tech on top of which the first customers can be won.”

A CTO, for example, might be comfortable using Scala, and that language might also be suitable to reach the startup’s goals. “But once you scale who are you going to hire?” said Wengi. “According to GitHub, Scala is one of the least popular languages. On the other hand, if you are building a robotic prototype you have little use of a language like Java, regardless of the quantity of talent you might be able to acquire.”

techPortfolio_Quote_May_5 (1)

For Leo Polovets, a partner at Susa Ventures and former software engineer at Google and LinkedIn, the programming language isn’t a factor for his fund unless the choice is clearly inappropriate. “If someone is trying to build cutting-edge deep learning APIs, then PHP is not the right language for that,” he said. “But PHP, while somewhat out of style, is perfectly fine for many other applications.”

The most popular programming languages for startups are Javascript, Ruby, Python and Java, according to Polovets’ analysis of AngelList data. He found that JavaScript is by far the dominant programming language choice for startups, followed by Ruby, Python and Java; Ruby on Rails is the top choice for front-end technology.

Polovets also correlates stronger startups with modern or functional programming languages, such as Go, Scala, Haskell, Erlang and Clojure. PHP, on the other hand, is on the decline, and several sites list developer pain points, such as PHPWTF and PHP Sadness.

Overall, though, VCs generally have no say over a startup’s tech stack, said Polovets. Most VCs are adept at evaluating founders, markets and business models, but don’t have the tech knowledge to recommend programming languages.

“Most investments happen after there’s already some code in place, or even a live product,” Polovets said, “Changing programming languages at that point would be a huge, unnecessary time sink.”

Startup Simulations: The Future of VC Funding

Wednesday, May 4th, 2016

Startups understand survival of the fittest. But some might find themselves weeded out of the ecosystem faster than expected if artificial intelligence is deployed to evaluate them.

Recent advances in gaming and AI are adding another layer of complexity to an already competitive landscape in the form of “startup simulations.” As finance becomes more data-driven, simulations – which have been long been leveraged for gaming – serve a new purpose: determining whether or not a startup receives funding.

Business and economic simulations have been around since the 1990s, including well-known examples such as SIMS and Capitalism. In the past, these games catered to a leisure market, while simulations created for business applications have predominately served training and modelling purposes. Their potential now exceeds that.

techPortfolio_Quote_May_3

Games have the ability to test a startup’s performance before it goes to market. Using real-world and real-time market and economic data, these simulations mimic the conditions a startup encounters at the time it seeks funding. Based on those conditions and predicted trends, VCs could watch the life-cycle of a startup play out within a game before deciding to invest.

Tweaking the parameters to resemble different geographic markets can  help VCs gauge where and when a startup might achieve success, or if it will fail regardless of the circumstances. Armed with that information, the risk of investing in any given startup could be lowered.

The current approach to valuations includes basic tools such as formulas, calculators, and spreadsheets, all supported  by a VC’s intuition.  While these tools may never completely vanish as part of a VC’s due diligence, they lack the predictive capabilities and rich-picture approach a simulation can provide.

Simulations aren’t just theoretical, futuristic ideas. Growth Science, a data science firm founded by Thomas Thurston, already uses them. Thurston’s simulations, he claims, correctly predicted that Snapchat, Uber, and Airbnb would be big  and that their accuracy  when predicting whether or not a company will still exist in five years is 66 percent.

“Comparing our ‘quant’ [quantitative] approach to traditional VCs is like comparing a qualitative stock picker with an algorithmic hedge fund,” says Thurston. “Our process is mechanical. We use data, math and rules to try and isolate the specific percentage probabilities that any business will hit our goals as investors. We invest based on quantified probabilities, rather than intuition.”

The implications for startups are huge.

According to Thurston, Growth Science can “not only make probability-based predictions about whether a startup will succeed or not, but they also let us run ‘what if’ scenarios and to test-drive multiple strategies. This way, we not only know what’s likely given the startup’s current assumptions, but we can also identify trouble spots and help the startup course-correct to be more successful.”

Growth Science claims to draw on private and public databases across industries, and has “guided billions of dollars in organic growth, acquisitions and corporate venture capital.” according to the company’s website.

What further implications might the prevalence of startup simulations have?

  • Venture capitalists might require a successful simulation from a reputable source before confirming investment and releasing funds. Valuations could be determined entirely by algorithms within simulations.
  • A startup’s international viability could be tested in advance, and used to determine the strategy and suitability for expansion into one market over another.
  • The gaming industry might follow suit and develop nuanced, AI and data-driven games for corporate clients who want an edge in formulating strategies, creating processes, risk management, increasing motivation/engagement, driving customer engagement, and developing talent.
  • Predictive analytics: Games could be used to identify real-world gaps and market opportunities, informing which businesses and services need to be created next.

Startup simulations have a broad economic impact if they are robust, realistic, and accurate. As the use of simulations becomes more widespread, the concept has the potential to alter how businesses are established, and how they grow beyond the early stages.

Startup simulations might not just predict future outcomes — they’ll create them.

Some details for this article were provided through a research project done as part of OCAD University’s Masters of Design, Strategic Foresight and Innovation program.

Where Did the Term Cockroach Come From?

Monday, May 2nd, 2016

With the glitter of tech unicorns fading, venture capitalists and investors are looking for decidedly less glamorous startups to back — and those companies have a name to match. Cockroaches.

A cockroach isn’t as clearly defined as a unicorn, startups with pre-IPO valuations of $1 billion or more. Instead, a cockroach, as the Irish Times described earlier this year, “refers to a startup consisting of hard-working founders who keep survival at the core of their business strategy.” It’s also been described as having the ability to quickly become frugal and run lean, although there are no financial parameters to that definition. David Cummings offered a list of characteristics that includes “little-to-no salaries for the entrepreneurs”.

So where did this skin-crawling term first gain traction online?

The earliest published reference we could find was from Dave McClure of 500 Startups in a Wired UK article from 2013. In the piece, McClure calls out entrepreneurs for “trying to build audiences without knowing how to monetize them.”

The article goes on: “He said that many people building startups think that engineering and design are the critical factors as to whether their business is successful. “I would challenge that. What’s missing in most startups is scalable, cash-flow profitable (costs you less to acquire the customer than you generate in revenue) distribution.””

A slideshare from McClure posted in June 2015 is the next reference to cockroaches, which has been shared 212 times across LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and Google+, according to Buzzsumo. In the presentation, he reiterates his message from two years earlier, that startups need to be lean and run “simpler, faster, smarter, cheaper.”

Three months later, in October 2015, Flickr co-founder Caterina Fake picks up the term for her column in Medium called “The Age of the Cockroach”.

In it, Fake points to the then looming funding crisis as the reason why unicorns will be replaced by cockroaches. She then offers this advice: “Companies that want to outlast the coming funding crisis will need to move fast, cut costs, and plan for a future without much money in it. They will have to lay off staff, move their pricy downtown office to the unsexy exurbs, pivot into revenue-generating business models, kill projects going nowhere, live with less.”

For the next four months, as investment funds continue their write downs and venture capitalists begin talking openly about a shift in their approaches, Fake’s column spread online. It has collected over 8000 shares across social media channels, according to Buzzsumo.

Finally, on February 11, 2016, the term cockroach scuttled its way into a mainstream media publication. It’s Business Insider‘s “Startups are realizing there’s no Plan B: They have to survive the bad times like ‘cockroaches’“. 

Fans Getting Closer Than Ever to Tour Action Thanks to the IoT

Wednesday, April 27th, 2016

As the official technology partner for the Tour de France, Dimension Data is changing the spectator experience of the world’s most prestigious cycling race with the IoT. Using IBM’s InfoSphere Streams analytics platform, Dimension Data monitored the real-time geolocational data of almost 200 riders over 21 days.

Every bicycle in the race was equipped with GPS sensors and a sophisticated relay system that transmitted data to apps, websites and broadcasters, giving fans and media the ability to track a rider’s progress throughout the race. The experience was no longer limited to a manual process that involved radios, stopwatches, and chasing riders on motorcycles to read the numbers on their shirts.

Dimension Data’s IoT solution provided a “positional fix every second, the latitude and longitude and the speed of every single rider,” IBM Asia Pacific’s Big Data Technical Leader Chris Howard told ReadWrite. “And from that raw data, we then did lots of things to determine their journey so far, how far they’d progressed, the ranking of the riders, the distance and times between all of the riders.”

In the future, a related IBM technology known as Quarks will provide cycling fans, broadcasters and team strategists deeper insights during the Tour. Quarks is an open source platform that lets developers create IoT applications to analyze data on the edge of their networks.

Howard believes that sensitive information such as “power output data, cycling cadence, pedalling cadence, respiration, [and] heart rate” could be gathered and used in a competitive nature.

To read more about how IoT is disrupting the Tour de France, please click here.

Startups Eat Into The $4.7 Trillion Financial Services Industry

Wednesday, April 20th, 2016

When Mark Andreessen of venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz, declared in 2011 that  ‘software is eating the world’, few predicted that banks – the bedrock institutions of economic activity – would be on the menu.

If Goldman Sachs is correct, fintech – which generally refers to “point solutions” created by startups to make payments, loans, and other financial transactions easier than what’s offered by incumbent banks –  could displace $4.7 trillion in revenue for financial services firms.

In Canada, fintech adoption is set to triple in the next year as startups like Wave and Trulioo unbundle banking services and products. In the U.S., Lending Club, one of the world’s largest fintech startups, has grown its loan portfolio rapidly since the San Francisco-based company went public in 2014

Angela Strange, an Andreessen Horowitz partner said in a keynote presentation at the Canadian Fintech Summit 2016 at MaRS Discovery District in Toronto that 75% of millennials would rather go to the dentist than listen to a bank’s message, and prefer financial services from the likes of Google, Amazon, and PayPal over those provided by banks.

Other stats Strange highlighted: Half of millennials think all banks are the same, and two-thirds of them don’t have credit cards.

Hundreds of Billions

The term fintech originally referred to the back-end processes of setting up servers and software applications for the front-end of traditional banking institutions. The definition has since evolved to include any tech solution that provides a financial service or competes with the offerings of financial institutions.

As an indication of the scale of this industry, these services generate more than $200 billion in returns for a group of 25 large banks analyzed by consulting firm Oliver Wyman.

And the competition is ramping up. A recent KPMG report reveals a booming North American alternative finance market. Transaction volume soared to $36.38 billion in 2015, up 213 percent on year.

fintech-fact

Moreover, senior executives in the financial services industry surveyed by PwC for a recent report say 23 percent of their business is vulnerable to further developments in fintech, and fintech founders say they’re targeting about a third of the incumbents’ business.

Another key insight from the Canadian Fintech Summit 2016 is that the future of money and banking is not a matter of big banks battling startups.

Established tech giants like Apple have entered the space with solutions like Apple Pay, and Samsung isn’t far behind. The future of money and banking will likely be a hybrid model that merges the distribution channels and trusted relationships forged by banks with the user-centric sensibility of startups.

Regulation and governance will continue to be concerns in the future. Strange may have said it best: “Fintech startups that will succeed in Canada are the ones that take regulations seriously. Think customers don’t care about anti-money laundering? You’ll end up in jail.”

Apart from shifting demographics and an evolving competitive landscape, other factors such as the use of digital currency and emerging technology will play a role in shaping the future of money.

Fintechs and big banks, for example, are both trying to determine how to adopt and govern blockchain, the structure that eliminates the need for a central clearinghouse to verify transactions.

Robo-advisors are expanding the fintech market, serving those who either do not want or cannot find a financial advisor.

Advancements in virtual reality, augmented reality, biometrics, and artificial intelligence will also offer new opportunities for further innovation.

Overall though, startups have the advantage in deploying innovations because they don’t need to work around legacy IT systems that aren’t easy to abandon because of the huge amount of data that becomes vulnerable in any migration. Meanwhile, millennials are looking for the easiest robo-advisors and automated savings apps.

Like hotels and publishers, the big banks have billions to lose if they don’t provide solutions that mobile-driven, brand-agnostic millennials want.