Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category

Under Armour Leverages IBM’s Watson to Challenge Fitbit

Thursday, May 12th, 2016

One of the biggest brands in athletic wear is charging into wearable tech with a pack of products and a pair of tech industry partnerships. Under Armour is leveraging artificial intelligence to give its offering an edge over competing products from Nike and Fitbit. 

Retailing for $400, HealthBox is a trio consisting of a Fitbit-like band, a digital scale and a heart-rate monitor. And UA isn’t starting from zero in its effort to tap demand for wearables.

Over the last few years, the company has snagged three massive online fitness communities: Endomondo, MapMyFitness and MyFitnessPal. They now control the largest online wellness-focused ecosystem, at 165 million users. And it’s what HealthBox can do with all that data that makes this a compelling package.

Under Armour partnered with HTC to develop the hardware and a smartphone app called UA Record, which ties all the products together. The UA fitness tracker is cleanly designed, made of a rubber-like material with a LED display. The heart rate monitor is constructed of durable band and the monitor glows when it detects a heartbeat. The scale measures weight and BMI. All the data from the three devices talk to each other and transfer data via Bluetooth to UA Record.

Cognitive Coaching

Under Armour’s partnership with IBM and the “cognitive coaching” potential of Watson differentiates HealthBox from the competition. By feeding nutrition, training, and sleep information into Watson, it’s “able to understand data in large volumes, make recommendations, and continuously learn,” says Chris Glodé, Under Armour’s VP digital, connected fitness. “The more data UA Record inputs, the smarter Watson becomes.”

UA has experimented with Internet of Things in the past. They built a sensor-laden compression T-shirt back in 2011 for the NFL Combine, where college stars worked out for prospective pro teams. The shirt provided raw data on acceleration, speed and heart rate for scouts to pour over. HealthBox and the partnership with IBM means that the Record app will be able to send the data to Watson to disambiguate.

Watson’s Cognitive Coaching uses a comparative model, grouping users based on criteria like age, gender and activity level in order to provide training and recovery recommendations.

And the experience will get richer over time.

“As you record more data and as more data is recorded across the community, the smarter the insights will become,”  Glodé says.

How Much is Cognitive Technology Helping the Raptors?

Tuesday, May 10th, 2016

A year ago the Raptors were victims of an unexpected 4-0 sweep in the first round of the NBA playoffs at the hands of the lower-ranked Washington Wizards. They’re now tied with the Miami Heat 2-2 in a grueling best-of-seven series, which will see the eventual winners play LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers in the Eastern Conference finals.

Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment, which owns the Raptors, announced in February that it would use cognitive analysis provided by IBM’s Watson technology platform, noting that Watson would be used mostly for talent acquisition.

Is cognitive technology one of the factors behind the improved performance?

It’s difficult to answer that question because the Raptors consider the IBM agreement to be a competitive advantage, and are therefore mum on this subject. With a head coach as tight lipped as Dwane Casey, this is hardly surprising.

There’s only been one addition to the team since IBM and the Raptors announced the use of Watson, so the application of cognitive technology might not be a factor unless they’re using Watson’s analysis for more than recruitment.

Unstructured Data

Traditional analytics-based approaches require data to be tightly structured and presented in a predictable format. Watson is different in that it makes sense of large volumes of unstructured data — video footage, news articles, scientific journals, social media, as examples —  which a few years ago would have required a human to interpret.

And the machine learns. The more data it’s fed, the better its predictions become. Each suggestion is even accompanied by a confidence level rating.

In professional sports, Watson can be used to determine, based on any number of parameters, if a player will be a good fit for a team’s social dynamics. Artificial intelligence can quickly identify, for example, a player who will fill the needs for a particular position, work within salary restrictions, and play well with teammates.

With two crucial contracts — Bismack Biyombo and DeMar DeRozan — on the table at the end of this season, a salary cap to manage and four first-round draft picks over the next two years, the next incarnation of the Raptors lineup is far from clear.

While it’s tough to gauge Watson’s impact on the current season, the platform is likely learning much as it analyzes players on and off the court. Whatever the case, fans should expect the big data addition to play a bigger role in the Raptors’ strategy going forward.

Investors Weigh in on Programming Language Choice

Thursday, May 5th, 2016

As a startup, your choice of programming language may not be top of mind for potential investors, but it can affect funding potential under some circumstances. We asked tech investors about factors to consider when making that choice.

For Federico Wengi, a venture capital associate with Paua Ventures in Berlin, startups should consider their comfort level with the language, where the market is going and if the language they choose is the best one to reach their goals. While VCs usually don’t try to change decisions around programming languages, the way programs are written could affect investment decisions.

“If we don’t like what we see in the tech [due diligence], we walk away,” Wengi said. “It is important that we can establish proof that the team has built a sustainable backbone of tech on top of which the first customers can be won.”

A CTO, for example, might be comfortable using Scala, and that language might also be suitable to reach the startup’s goals. “But once you scale who are you going to hire?” said Wengi. “According to GitHub, Scala is one of the least popular languages. On the other hand, if you are building a robotic prototype you have little use of a language like Java, regardless of the quantity of talent you might be able to acquire.”

techPortfolio_Quote_May_5 (1)

For Leo Polovets, a partner at Susa Ventures and former software engineer at Google and LinkedIn, the programming language isn’t a factor for his fund unless the choice is clearly inappropriate. “If someone is trying to build cutting-edge deep learning APIs, then PHP is not the right language for that,” he said. “But PHP, while somewhat out of style, is perfectly fine for many other applications.”

The most popular programming languages for startups are Javascript, Ruby, Python and Java, according to Polovets’ analysis of AngelList data. He found that JavaScript is by far the dominant programming language choice for startups, followed by Ruby, Python and Java; Ruby on Rails is the top choice for front-end technology.

Polovets also correlates stronger startups with modern or functional programming languages, such as Go, Scala, Haskell, Erlang and Clojure. PHP, on the other hand, is on the decline, and several sites list developer pain points, such as PHPWTF and PHP Sadness.

Overall, though, VCs generally have no say over a startup’s tech stack, said Polovets. Most VCs are adept at evaluating founders, markets and business models, but don’t have the tech knowledge to recommend programming languages.

“Most investments happen after there’s already some code in place, or even a live product,” Polovets said, “Changing programming languages at that point would be a huge, unnecessary time sink.”

Startup Simulations: The Future of VC Funding

Wednesday, May 4th, 2016

Startups understand survival of the fittest. But some might find themselves weeded out of the ecosystem faster than expected if artificial intelligence is deployed to evaluate them.

Recent advances in gaming and AI are adding another layer of complexity to an already competitive landscape in the form of “startup simulations.” As finance becomes more data-driven, simulations – which have been long been leveraged for gaming – serve a new purpose: determining whether or not a startup receives funding.

Business and economic simulations have been around since the 1990s, including well-known examples such as SIMS and Capitalism. In the past, these games catered to a leisure market, while simulations created for business applications have predominately served training and modelling purposes. Their potential now exceeds that.

techPortfolio_Quote_May_3

Games have the ability to test a startup’s performance before it goes to market. Using real-world and real-time market and economic data, these simulations mimic the conditions a startup encounters at the time it seeks funding. Based on those conditions and predicted trends, VCs could watch the life-cycle of a startup play out within a game before deciding to invest.

Tweaking the parameters to resemble different geographic markets can  help VCs gauge where and when a startup might achieve success, or if it will fail regardless of the circumstances. Armed with that information, the risk of investing in any given startup could be lowered.

The current approach to valuations includes basic tools such as formulas, calculators, and spreadsheets, all supported  by a VC’s intuition.  While these tools may never completely vanish as part of a VC’s due diligence, they lack the predictive capabilities and rich-picture approach a simulation can provide.

Simulations aren’t just theoretical, futuristic ideas. Growth Science, a data science firm founded by Thomas Thurston, already uses them. Thurston’s simulations, he claims, correctly predicted that Snapchat, Uber, and Airbnb would be big  and that their accuracy  when predicting whether or not a company will still exist in five years is 66 percent.

“Comparing our ‘quant’ [quantitative] approach to traditional VCs is like comparing a qualitative stock picker with an algorithmic hedge fund,” says Thurston. “Our process is mechanical. We use data, math and rules to try and isolate the specific percentage probabilities that any business will hit our goals as investors. We invest based on quantified probabilities, rather than intuition.”

The implications for startups are huge.

According to Thurston, Growth Science can “not only make probability-based predictions about whether a startup will succeed or not, but they also let us run ‘what if’ scenarios and to test-drive multiple strategies. This way, we not only know what’s likely given the startup’s current assumptions, but we can also identify trouble spots and help the startup course-correct to be more successful.”

Growth Science claims to draw on private and public databases across industries, and has “guided billions of dollars in organic growth, acquisitions and corporate venture capital.” according to the company’s website.

What further implications might the prevalence of startup simulations have?

  • Venture capitalists might require a successful simulation from a reputable source before confirming investment and releasing funds. Valuations could be determined entirely by algorithms within simulations.
  • A startup’s international viability could be tested in advance, and used to determine the strategy and suitability for expansion into one market over another.
  • The gaming industry might follow suit and develop nuanced, AI and data-driven games for corporate clients who want an edge in formulating strategies, creating processes, risk management, increasing motivation/engagement, driving customer engagement, and developing talent.
  • Predictive analytics: Games could be used to identify real-world gaps and market opportunities, informing which businesses and services need to be created next.

Startup simulations have a broad economic impact if they are robust, realistic, and accurate. As the use of simulations becomes more widespread, the concept has the potential to alter how businesses are established, and how they grow beyond the early stages.

Startup simulations might not just predict future outcomes — they’ll create them.

Some details for this article were provided through a research project done as part of OCAD University’s Masters of Design, Strategic Foresight and Innovation program.

Where Did the Term Cockroach Come From?

Monday, May 2nd, 2016

With the glitter of tech unicorns fading, venture capitalists and investors are looking for decidedly less glamorous startups to back — and those companies have a name to match. Cockroaches.

A cockroach isn’t as clearly defined as a unicorn, startups with pre-IPO valuations of $1 billion or more. Instead, a cockroach, as the Irish Times described earlier this year, “refers to a startup consisting of hard-working founders who keep survival at the core of their business strategy.” It’s also been described as having the ability to quickly become frugal and run lean, although there are no financial parameters to that definition. David Cummings offered a list of characteristics that includes “little-to-no salaries for the entrepreneurs”.

So where did this skin-crawling term first gain traction online?

The earliest published reference we could find was from Dave McClure of 500 Startups in a Wired UK article from 2013. In the piece, McClure calls out entrepreneurs for “trying to build audiences without knowing how to monetize them.”

The article goes on: “He said that many people building startups think that engineering and design are the critical factors as to whether their business is successful. “I would challenge that. What’s missing in most startups is scalable, cash-flow profitable (costs you less to acquire the customer than you generate in revenue) distribution.””

A slideshare from McClure posted in June 2015 is the next reference to cockroaches, which has been shared 212 times across LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and Google+, according to Buzzsumo. In the presentation, he reiterates his message from two years earlier, that startups need to be lean and run “simpler, faster, smarter, cheaper.”

Three months later, in October 2015, Flickr co-founder Caterina Fake picks up the term for her column in Medium called “The Age of the Cockroach”.

In it, Fake points to the then looming funding crisis as the reason why unicorns will be replaced by cockroaches. She then offers this advice: “Companies that want to outlast the coming funding crisis will need to move fast, cut costs, and plan for a future without much money in it. They will have to lay off staff, move their pricy downtown office to the unsexy exurbs, pivot into revenue-generating business models, kill projects going nowhere, live with less.”

For the next four months, as investment funds continue their write downs and venture capitalists begin talking openly about a shift in their approaches, Fake’s column spread online. It has collected over 8000 shares across social media channels, according to Buzzsumo.

Finally, on February 11, 2016, the term cockroach scuttled its way into a mainstream media publication. It’s Business Insider‘s “Startups are realizing there’s no Plan B: They have to survive the bad times like ‘cockroaches’“. 

Fans Getting Closer Than Ever to Tour Action Thanks to the IoT

Wednesday, April 27th, 2016

As the official technology partner for the Tour de France, Dimension Data is changing the spectator experience of the world’s most prestigious cycling race with the IoT. Using IBM’s InfoSphere Streams analytics platform, Dimension Data monitored the real-time geolocational data of almost 200 riders over 21 days.

Every bicycle in the race was equipped with GPS sensors and a sophisticated relay system that transmitted data to apps, websites and broadcasters, giving fans and media the ability to track a rider’s progress throughout the race. The experience was no longer limited to a manual process that involved radios, stopwatches, and chasing riders on motorcycles to read the numbers on their shirts.

Dimension Data’s IoT solution provided a “positional fix every second, the latitude and longitude and the speed of every single rider,” IBM Asia Pacific’s Big Data Technical Leader Chris Howard told ReadWrite. “And from that raw data, we then did lots of things to determine their journey so far, how far they’d progressed, the ranking of the riders, the distance and times between all of the riders.”

In the future, a related IBM technology known as Quarks will provide cycling fans, broadcasters and team strategists deeper insights during the Tour. Quarks is an open source platform that lets developers create IoT applications to analyze data on the edge of their networks.

Howard believes that sensitive information such as “power output data, cycling cadence, pedalling cadence, respiration, [and] heart rate” could be gathered and used in a competitive nature.

To read more about how IoT is disrupting the Tour de France, please click here.

Startups Eat Into The $4.7 Trillion Financial Services Industry

Wednesday, April 20th, 2016

When Mark Andreessen of venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz, declared in 2011 that  ‘software is eating the world’, few predicted that banks – the bedrock institutions of economic activity – would be on the menu.

If Goldman Sachs is correct, fintech – which generally refers to “point solutions” created by startups to make payments, loans, and other financial transactions easier than what’s offered by incumbent banks –  could displace $4.7 trillion in revenue for financial services firms.

In Canada, fintech adoption is set to triple in the next year as startups like Wave and Trulioo unbundle banking services and products. In the U.S., Lending Club, one of the world’s largest fintech startups, has grown its loan portfolio rapidly since the San Francisco-based company went public in 2014

Angela Strange, an Andreessen Horowitz partner said in a keynote presentation at the Canadian Fintech Summit 2016 at MaRS Discovery District in Toronto that 75% of millennials would rather go to the dentist than listen to a bank’s message, and prefer financial services from the likes of Google, Amazon, and PayPal over those provided by banks.

Other stats Strange highlighted: Half of millennials think all banks are the same, and two-thirds of them don’t have credit cards.

Hundreds of Billions

The term fintech originally referred to the back-end processes of setting up servers and software applications for the front-end of traditional banking institutions. The definition has since evolved to include any tech solution that provides a financial service or competes with the offerings of financial institutions.

As an indication of the scale of this industry, these services generate more than $200 billion in returns for a group of 25 large banks analyzed by consulting firm Oliver Wyman.

And the competition is ramping up. A recent KPMG report reveals a booming North American alternative finance market. Transaction volume soared to $36.38 billion in 2015, up 213 percent on year.

fintech-fact

Moreover, senior executives in the financial services industry surveyed by PwC for a recent report say 23 percent of their business is vulnerable to further developments in fintech, and fintech founders say they’re targeting about a third of the incumbents’ business.

Another key insight from the Canadian Fintech Summit 2016 is that the future of money and banking is not a matter of big banks battling startups.

Established tech giants like Apple have entered the space with solutions like Apple Pay, and Samsung isn’t far behind. The future of money and banking will likely be a hybrid model that merges the distribution channels and trusted relationships forged by banks with the user-centric sensibility of startups.

Regulation and governance will continue to be concerns in the future. Strange may have said it best: “Fintech startups that will succeed in Canada are the ones that take regulations seriously. Think customers don’t care about anti-money laundering? You’ll end up in jail.”

Apart from shifting demographics and an evolving competitive landscape, other factors such as the use of digital currency and emerging technology will play a role in shaping the future of money.

Fintechs and big banks, for example, are both trying to determine how to adopt and govern blockchain, the structure that eliminates the need for a central clearinghouse to verify transactions.

Robo-advisors are expanding the fintech market, serving those who either do not want or cannot find a financial advisor.

Advancements in virtual reality, augmented reality, biometrics, and artificial intelligence will also offer new opportunities for further innovation.

Overall though, startups have the advantage in deploying innovations because they don’t need to work around legacy IT systems that aren’t easy to abandon because of the huge amount of data that becomes vulnerable in any migration. Meanwhile, millennials are looking for the easiest robo-advisors and automated savings apps.

Like hotels and publishers, the big banks have billions to lose if they don’t provide solutions that mobile-driven, brand-agnostic millennials want.

Halliburton Chooses IBM Cloud to Help Cut Oilfield Development Costs

Wednesday, April 20th, 2016

Halliburton, the global oilfield services company that works with many of the world’s largest oil and gas players, has adopted IBM Cloud to run more detailed reservoir simulations, which may help struggling producers cut costs.

Record low oil prices, caused by strong output among oil producing nations amid weaker global demand, have put pressure on producers of the fossil fuel to lower extraction costs. Crude oil prices have fallen by more than half in the past two years, and talks between OPEC and Russia aimed at curbing production have stalled.

“Using high performance computing of the IBM Cloud, we can run very detailed simulation models and evaluate a wide range of field development options, which translates into better field development plans for our clients and a competitive advantage for our business,” Steven Knabe, a Halliburton Consulting director, said in an IBM statement.

The world’s biggest oil companies are expected to report their worst quarterly earnings in more than a decade because the industry’s cost-cutting efforts haven’t yet offset the decline in crude prices, Bloomberg reported. This adds pressure on producers to leverage technology to help plan reservoir development in a way that maximizes returns.

Like many industries, oil and gas companies are turning to technical advances available through cloud computing, data analytics, and machine learning to boost productivity.

And there is room for growth. “While some oil and gas companies have invested in their analytics capabilities, many struggle to get their arms around this powerful new opportunity,” consulting firm Bain & Company said in a report titled “Big Data analytics in oil and gas.”

Adopting IBM Cloud technology allows Halliburton to “quickly run hundreds of simulation cases to forecast the possible behavior of complex oil and gas fields,” according to the IBM statement, which doesn’t disclose terms for the company’s usage of IBM Cloud.

IBM markets a range of solutions for enhancing production, improving processing efficiency, and optimizing global operations for the oil and gas industry.

Halliburton Consulting specializes in formulating development plans for both new and mature fields.

Cinemagraph Pioneer Flixel Hits a Milestone that Investors Prize

Tuesday, April 12th, 2016

Flixel, the Toronto startup recently selected as a Facebook partner for its living-photo technology known as cinemagraphs, is now funding growth through its own sales, a parameter that many investors want instead of growth-at-all-costs.

More paying customers allow Flixel, whose main product is Cinemagraph Pro, to split revenues between product development and marketing efforts channeled through Facebook.

“Since our pricing model allows us to acquire customers through targeted Facebook ads, we are able to have a healthy CAC/LTV (customer acquisition cost/ lifetime value) ratio,” says CEO and cofounder Philippe LeBlanc.

The Flixel startup story includes overcoming tough odds before finally getting their big break with the TV program America’s Next Top Model, and an investment from show’s host, supermodel Tyra Banks. The company’s success has since been propelled by the growing interest brands have in using Flixel’s cinemagraphs on social media sites such as Facebook and Instagram. The visuals are more engaging than straight stills, LeBlanc says, adding that they’re also shorter and more cost effective than video.

The Facebook association will only deepen now that Flixel’s cinemagraphs have become a free option for profile photos on the platform that boasts about 1.6 billion regular users.

Prices Rise

Flixel sells software, hosting and licensing services for customers making their own cinemagraphs, and has a creative team producing them for brands including Netflix, Panasonic, and A&E. Flixel’s apps, both iOS and Mac, have been downloaded over 1 million times, according to a spokesperson. The company won’t provide further details about their revenues.

By raising the price of its mobile app 400%, Flixel is doubling down on revenue growth as its strategy as opposed to user growth. Because the processing power of the latest iPhones and iPads allow Flixel are on par, CTO Mark Pavlidis explains, Flixel has made its iOS app equal to the Mac app in terms of functionality. Flixel also sells a subscription version for $199 a year.

“We believe the price raise will have an increase in revenue both in terms of licensing sales, but more importantly in terms of tipping the scale to go the subscription route versus licensing each of our product lines separately,” LeBlanc says. “Raising money is always easier when a) you don’t need venture money b) you can show your revenue is growing and that additional money will only serve to accelerate this growth.”

Flixel’s customers are largely Adobe Creative Cloud users, including photographers, videographers, as well as creative directors at a wide range of marketing and advertising agencies. In addition to Tyra Banks, Flixel has been funded by a handful of private investors, as well as the Business Development Bank of Canada and the New Brunswick Innovation Foundation.

Canada’s Big Banks Turn to Hackers for Innovation

Thursday, March 31st, 2016

Canada’s banking system emerged largely unscathed by the global financial meltdown that started in 2008, earning the country so much credit that the Bank of England drafted Mark Carney, the Bank of Canada’s governor throughout the crisis, to be its leader.

Prudent Canadian lending practices, however, haven’t translated into innovation. According to MaRS, the Toronto-based non-profit that commercializes home-grown tech, Canada’s financial center and largest city is ranked ninth globally for fintech innovation. Global investment in fintech ventures jumped to about $12.2 billion in 2014, according to a report from management consultancy firm Accenture, making it a key area for any city aiming to stand out as a tech ecosystem.

“The big banks are a little late to the game, but we have the major ingredients for a strong fintech ecosystem,” says Robert Antoniades, general partner and co-founder of Information Venture Partners, a Toronto-based venture capital firm.

Hackathon

Go Grassroots

One way for big institutions to engage with the next generation of innovators is through grassroots meetups. Scotiabank recently delved into hackathons for the first time, hosting their Debt Challenge, where 100 coders and designers crammed into the bank’s boardroom for a 40-hour competition.

“I met my team for the first time in the conference room,” says Mohit Kishore, a 23-year-old computer science student at York University in Toronto. Kishore had been to hackathons before with Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) and coder meetups. “I prefer to work with new people,” he says. “Working with those you know doesn’t always produce new ideas.”

Mohit’s team created SCOTTY (Scotiabank Optimization Tool for You), a personal financial advisor built with Android, IBM’s Watson—which leveraged its powerful machine-learning capabilities—and their cloud platform Bluemix.

SCOTTY scored the team second place. Piggly, a Tamagotchi-like piggy bank where users have to spend real money to keep it alive, won the $15,000 grand prize.

 

hackathon2

“One of the guys on the team saw a similar concept discussed on Reddit,” says Cassandra Hui of the winning team, who developed the idea in advance. Hui even sat down with credit counselors to figure out how to gamify paying off debt. They’re now in talks with Scotiabank over how to potentially implement Piggly through the bank’s Digital Lab.

Be Aggressive

Hackathons are one way Canadian banks can innovate but they still need to share ideas and be more aggressive, says Antoniades.

“What I like is that each big institution now has an innovation strategy,” he says. “We’re still seeing banks wanting exclusivity.

“Banks need to be able to make quicker decisions with a technology. But it’s only a matter of time before that changes.”

Are you a developer looking to innovate? Try IBM’s Bluemix for free for 30 days.

Jeopardy-Winning Supercomputer Could Be Toronto Raptors’ MVP

Thursday, March 31st, 2016

Big data and artificial intelligence have become game-changers for major league sports — an industry that drives more than $10 billion in economic value — by giving managers increasingly effective tools to bring their teams into the finals.

In “Big Data Analysis is Changing the Nature of Sports Science,” MIT Technology Review analyzed how those with the largest vested interests in sports are trying to use data “to gain a competitive advantage, whether in real time during the game or to help in training, preparation, or recruitment.”

As part of the data race in professional sports, the Toronto Raptors partnered with IBM to leverage the tech giant’s Watson technology platform. The computer – well known for its appearance on Jeopardy! – can parse huge amounts of unstructured data, and learn from these data sets, to answer questions accurately in a variety of fields. In the world of sports, Watson can collect statistics, medical records, video, and social network sentiment, and use them to help the team decide if a given player fits the team’s needs (physically or mentally), can stay healthy and looks likely to succeed.

Where scouts can analyze a player’s performance in the moment, Watson’s cognitive abilities can examine more of the intangibles — for example, if a player’s attitude aligns with the team’s competitive atmosphere. Big data can theoretically stop toxic player relations before they start.

Sponsorship Returns

Teams that perform well generate more viewer interest, and thus get a bigger cut of the $24 billion in TV broadcasting deals that the NBA clinched for the nine years starting in 2014. Sponsorship agreements with brands like Pepsi and Anheuser-Busch raise the stakes even higher.

The Raptors-IBM partnership is still in its early days, and Watson’s data may, in the future, include medical data — perhaps players will even use wearables to track their health in real time. The idea isn’t to completely replace coaching staff and other advisors; it’s to build on the human element.

Athletes, coaches and front office staff have in the past had difficulty communicating their needs, but big data seems to be changing that with easier-to-interpret and more meaningful data.

“The biggest transformation in the world of sports isn’t simply the fact that there is so much more data available — it’s the fact that it’s breaking down barriers between groups that were historically distinct and sometimes struggled to communicate,” sports analyst Dash Davidson wrote for VentureBeat.

Catch of the Year

Meanwhile, baseball fans now have more statistics to look at than ever, in a sport where statistics are king. In April 2015, MLB Advanced Media (MLBAM) launched StatCast, which allows for deeper looks at every hit, defensive play and pitch, using an array of radars and hi-res optical cameras.

To herald the launch, MLBAM demonstrated StatCast’s abilities by analyzing the Blue Jays’ most jaw-dropping catch of the year, courtesy of outfielder Kevin Pillar. Last year, the Tampa Bay Rays’ Tim Beckham hammered a pitch deep into left field. Running out of room, Pillar used the left-field wall as a brace and sprung himself high enough to catch the ball. StatCast tracked Pillar’s top running speed (15.2 miles an hour), his distance covered (81.3 feet) and even his route efficiency (97.9%).

Since then, StatCast has given fans an endless array of data to further measure performance. It can give a deeper look at home runs, for example. On September 6, 2015, the Chicago Cub’s Kris Bryant hit the longest home run of the season. StatCast revealed just how impressive it was: It left Bryant’s bat at a scorching 111.5 miles per hour at a launch angle of 33 degrees and was projected to fly 495 feet.

StatCast’s petabytes of data can help general managers compare hits and defensive plays against players’ previous records. Players themselves, in turn, have better video to learn from.

On September 16, 2015, former Jays pitcher David Price wanted more insight into how Ryan Goins got an out on what looked to be an infield single from the Atlanta Braves’ Nick Markakis. Price asked StatCast on Twitter to analyze the play, and eventually analysis showed Goins took his first step just 0.24 seconds after the ball left Markakis’ bat. He covered 24.8 feet and threw the ball at 66.5 mph to achieve the out at first base.

Just as with the Raptors-Watson partnership, StatCast will no doubt become an important tool for front offices in their draft-pick decisions. Digital enhancements look to become as important as home runs and three-point shots.

EU Struggles to Unlock Value of a Digital Single Market

Thursday, March 31st, 2016

The European Commission recently passed the halfway mark in a plan to help revitalize the region’s economy by allowing freer digital trade, an initiative the executive body claims could unleash €415 billion ($473 billion) in economic growth through streaming, online shopping, and cloud computing by the end of this decade.

Realizing “a true single market for online content and services,” also known as the Digital Single Market, is part of the Europe 2020 plan. Among other measures, the plan includes steps to harmonize some transaction levies, end roaming charges within the economic union, and simplify rules about the amount of personal information consumers must provide to buy online. More than halfway to the deadline, European cities hold only three spots in a top-20 ranking of the world’s startup ecosystems conducted by data benchmarking company Compass.

“The European Commission’s Digital Single Market strategy is a progressive move that is needed to stimulate technology entrepreneurship within the European Union,” Dr. Ben Sanders, a lecturer in computer networking and information security at the UK’s Anglia Ruskin University, said in an interview with TechPORTFOLIO. “Fragmentation and barriers that have been removed in the physical single market remain in the digital domain and only serve to impede growth in this sector.”

Net Neutrality

Europe isn’t standing still, though. In June 2015, the European Parliament and Justice Council agreed to end roaming charges for all EU mobile subscribers within the trading bloc by June 2017 and to strengthen net neutrality rules protecting the right of every European to access Internet content without discrimination. These measures will be completed by an overhaul of EU telecoms rules this year.

In spite of the policy supports and investments being made by the European Commission, startups in Europe still find themselves at a disadvantage relative to the U.S. In a Harvard Business Review analysis, author Larry Downes looked into what may be holding back European startups. Downes found that the U.S. provided important advantages around issues such as tax policy, legal risk and regulation. In particular, Downes noted the following:

“Another piece of Clinton-era wisdom is a U.S. law known as Section 230. Passed as part of the Communications Act of 1996, Section 230 insulates Internet companies, website hosts, and ISPs from legal liability stemming from content posted by users. It’s hard to imagine the social media revolution — think Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit — taking place without that background rule. Which is why none of those companies came from Europe, which has no such protections.”

The Wall Street Journal looked at another possible reason for why startups in Europe lagged those in the U.S.: the difference in appetite for risk. For example, European companies raised €2.6 billion ($3 billion) from venture capital funds in the first three months of this year. In comparison, U.S.-based companies raised $15.7 billion in the same time period.

“The United States of Europe”

“As of today you have two great centers: China and US. The choice is whether Europe wants to play the role of the third great center or a bunch of smaller ecosystems,” Federico Wengi, Venture Capital Associate at Berlin-based Paua Ventures GmbH, said in an interview. Wengi said he advocates something “even further” than the digital single market, “at best something that resembles the United States of Europe.”

Despite the challenges Europe is experiencing in its digital economy effort, or perhaps because of them, more substantial measures are slated to take effect soon. In January, members of the European Parliament (MEPs) passed a resolution urging the EU to table 16 Digital Single Market initiatives announced by the European Commission EC in May 2015 without delay.

Andrus Ansip, the European Commission’s vice president, who’s steering the Digital Single Market initiative has responded to doubts about its prospects. In a recent interview with re/code, Ansip said: “I would like to say very clearly: This commission does not have any plans to kill innovations or overregulate platforms. To provide more clarity? Yes. But to kill innovation, overregulating platforms? No way.”

F&B Startup Hungry for Growth, Eyes Big City

Thursday, March 31st, 2016

7shifts, a mobile- and web-based restaurant scheduling company based in Saskatoon, has recently established a two-person sales team in Toronto — the company’s latest move in an effort to compete with industry leader, Austin-based HotSchedules.

In addition to the expansion into Toronto, which has the density of restaurants 7shifts requires for business development, CEO Jordan Boesch is bulking out his company’s Saskatoon development team to speed up integration of 7shifts with partner platforms including TouchBistro, an iPad-based point-of-sale solution for restaurants. Boesch is using the remainder of a round of angel investment 7shifts received in 2014 to add five more developers to the team, bringing the total to 14.

“We’re slowly nipping at [HotSchedules’] heels, and getting some good traction,” Boesch said in an interview. “Stuff we’re missing to become the greatest [restaurant scheduling platform] is in development right now, especially around reporting.”

‘Looking For Apps’

The growth of 7shifts, as it competes in the sector, reflects the economic benefit at the intersection of cloud-based connectivity and demographic change. Millennials are stepping into management positions in the food and beverage sector, and “they’re looking for apps,” Boesch said. Although tiny now, 7shifts might become a significant employer for Saskatoon and Toronto if the company gets out in front of HotSchedules.

Boesch is in talks with potential investors, seeking additional capital to improve the platform. Meanwhile, 7shifts continues to bring on additional customers, about 90% of which are in the U.S. The company recently signed 90 Burger King locations in Alabama, which would bring in revenues from US$2,250 to US$6,300 per month, depending on the level of service selected.

In an increasingly cautious funding atmosphere, where analysts are writing down the values of Netflix and Hootsuite for stressing user growth over revenues, 7shifts’ conservation of seed capital while taking on paying clients will be crucial in helping the company secure additional funding.

“Founders are realizing the need to rethink prior assumptions about prioritizing growth above all else, and are increasingly focusing on burn rate, profitability and the path toward self-sufficiency,” First Round Capital said in a letter to its partners in February.

“We’ve managed to hit good revenue targets, so we’re not burning a ton of cash, which puts us in a good place for raising more capital,” Boesch said.

[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/257494112″ params=”auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true” width=”100%” height=”450″ iframe=”true” /]

VIDEO: Military Experience Powers Tel Aviv Startup Ecosystem

Thursday, March 31st, 2016

With more startups per capita than anywhere in the world, Tel Aviv is consistently ranked among the world’s leading tech cities, making it a formidable competitor to Silicon Valley, London and Berlin.

At the same time, Israeli startups command an outsized presence on the most important equity exchanges. After the U.S. and Canada, Nasdaq has more Israeli companies than from any other country, and London boasts more Israeli IPOs than from any other foreign nation.

Avichay Nissenbaum, general partner at Tel Aviv-based Venture Capital firm Lool Ventures, and other members of the city’s startup community talk about why Tel Aviv works.  

https://youtu.be/XdYdcSzejkw