Archive for the ‘Startups’ Category

Recode Co-Founder Calls Out Silicon Valley Indifference to Social Issues

Friday, July 15th, 2016

Silicon Valley is making billions solving problems of convenience, such as instant food delivery, for “the 1%” while ignoring the social and economic problems of the urban ecosystem it depends on, Recode Co-Founder and Executive Editor Kara Swisher says.

Speaking on the second day of StartupFest in Montréal, Swisher called San Francisco “assisted living for millennials,” with conveniences such as instant food delivery provided through mobile apps by local startups working against a backdrop of homelessness and poverty.

She called on startups to break out of their “self-reinforcing” culture and affect the real world around them more positively.

This disconnect between Silicon Valley startups and San Francisco’s less fortunate residents gained global attention in 2014, when tech companies started providing buses to allow workers to commute to their campuses. The ease with which startup talent can commute has helped turn San Francisco into a “bedroom city.”

The social problems haven’t been completely ignored. A recent poll of San Francisco residents found that they identified homelessness as the number one social problem in the city. A startup founder who called the city’s homeless “grotesque” was excoriated for making his comments.

Swisher said she believes in the ability of startups and capitalism to solve social problems, a notion shared by fellow speaker Ari Gleisher. Gleisher, ex-of intelligence tech company Palantir, implored the audience to examine where they could do the most good in the world and aim their efforts carefully.

See all of TechPORTFOLIO’s up-to-date Startupfest coverage on social media by following us on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn – and now on Instagram.

 

Brexit May Mean New European Bases For Fintech

Tuesday, July 12th, 2016

Where banks live, fintech grows, and London’s reputation as a global financial center is under threat following Brexit. Banks, funds, and government have banded together – explicitly mentioning fintech – and promised to protect the city’s reputation.

But questions remain over bank passporting, which allows UK-based banks entry to trade throughout the EU. Access to labor also remains uncertain; in fact, EU citizens’ post-Brexit status has become a political soccer ball.

So if not London, where should fintech startups look? Berlin has emerged as an early contender for the continent’s fintech centre. According to the FT, there is already an exciting fintech scene in the German capital. Two London-based fintech startups, TransferWise and Revolut, are on record as considering a move to Berlin.

Meanwhile, one German political party has mustered a billboard van and sent it roaming the British capital’s streets looking for first movers.

William McQuillan, partner at Frontline Ventures, says he doubts London will lose its central financial crown any time soon. “London still is a global city with a large consumer population, and many global companies are HQ’d there,” he said in an interview with TechPORTFOLIO.

There are top class universities, most of the startup accelerators in Europe, as well as a healthy angel investing environment. “All other cities in Europe are still building up those qualities and most will never have all of them.”

It’s more likely that many other European cities would collectively drain part of London’s power.

Dublin may be a better contender than Berlin in this regard, he says. “It would be the only English speaking country in both the EU and EuroZone, and 250 of the world’s leading financial firms – including half of the world’s top 50 banks – have internationally focused operations in Ireland.”

PayPal and Stripe are two major fintech companies already established in the Irish capital, and €1.8 trillion of funds are administered by organizations there.

If there’s one positive thing in fintech that Brexit may have caused, it was the surge in Bitcoin as a safe haven following GBP’s fall to a 30-year-low. The weak pound could also encourage foreign buyers and investors, according to the Telegraph.

The only certainty is that no one knows how much Brexit has damaged London’s status as a fintech center until the political turmoil resolves itself and decisions are finalized.

McQuillan says: “The longer the uncertainty lasts the worse the reputational damage for a city like London will be.”

StartupFest Revs Up For 2016 in Montréal

Friday, July 8th, 2016

StartupFest, Canada’s biggest gathering of startups, VCs, angels, and accelerators is happening from 13 July to 16 July. TechPORTFOLIO will be there in Montréal, covering all the discussions that matter.

Kara Swisher, executive editor of re/code, will talk with Shopify CEO Tobias Lütke on how the company went global, with customers including the LA Lakers and partners such as Singapore’s SingTel, while remaining true to its Canadian roots. Swisher will also discuss her cameo on HBO’s Silicon Valley. Alexis Ohanian, co-founder of Reddit, will talk about pseudonymity and community-building.

There will also be plenty of material for startups looking for insights on business building and funding.

Robert Simon, Senior Managing Partner at BDC IT Venture Fund, David Beyer, Investor at Amplify Partners, and Whitney Rockley, Managing Partner of McRock Capital, will be participating a VC AMA allowing audience members to pose questions and find out what they look for in early-stage businesses. Jevon MacDonald, co-founder of Startupnorth.ca, will talk about lessons learned from successful entrepreneurs.

Opening the festival will be specific streams catering to scale-ups, angel investors and more.  Ben Zifkin, Founder and CEO of Hubba, and John Ruffolo of OMERS Ventures will be among those lending their expertise in special roundtable discussions. What’s more, angel investors are roaming the festival – impress them with your idea and you may be shortlisted to win $200K of funding.

Follow us on Twitter @TechPORTFOLIO and let us know if you’re attending. We’d love to chat.

If Banks Aren’t Absorbing Fintech Startup Products, They’re Investing in Them

Monday, July 4th, 2016

YES

Q: Will fintech force the banks to change?

ANSWER: YES

Be it blockchain or mobile loans, fintech innovation is happening, and the old guard needs to get on board or face falling behind. Traditional banks that embrace the technological and cultural change fintech is forcing on them are also more likely to see their business grow alongside it.

Some banks are getting the picture, learning the tools of the fintech trade by partnering with and investing in fintech startups and incubators instead of trying to build the technology starting from scratch.

Consider a recent move by CIBC to set up the “C-Suite” at MaRS in Toronto, a space physically separated from its corporate headquarters. The office has fewer regulations, giving developers breathing room to create new products for the bank, including its Apple Watch app.

Aayaz Pira, Senior Vice-President, CIBC Digital Retail & Business Banking, explains that the team focuses on client experience only. “It’s very important that we foster a test and learn environment.  While we enjoy great successes some projects never make it off that ground – and that’s OK.”

Others seek the expertise of startups through competitions such as “The Next Big Idea in Fintechby BMO and Ryerson University’s DMZ, or collaboration spaces hosted by Boston’s Workbar and Digital Credit Union, one of the largest credit unions in the U.S.

While the big banks are generally doing a good job of delivering the right product mix for the masses, “there are some areas for improvement,” says Sean Cooper, a consumer financial journalist. Cooper cites fintech firms such as online lender Grow and robo-advisor WealthSimple as having success to date in “filling the gaps” left by traditional banks.

Many banks are also choosing to invest directly in fintech players to gain market access. For example, Goldman Sachs is an investor in Boston-based Circle, an international money transfer app that converts between local currencies and Bitcoin, with a separate division in China. Other investors in Circle include Baidu and Beijing-based investment firm IDG Capital.

Forbes’ fintech expert Laura Shin says that if Circle successfully adds the renminbi as an available currency, it could tap into a potentially lucrative stream of Chinese students studying abroad.  

“We want to enable Chinese consumers to share value with anyone in the U.S., with anyone in Europe, and, through the blockchain, with anyone in the world instantly,” Circle chief executive Jeremy Allaire told Shin.

Because fintechs are still relatively new to the financial services world, especially in comparison to most financial institutions, the challenge for the banks will be partnering with and investing in startups that are expected to survive and thrive. It’s a tough call given the failure rate of startups. Of course, banks have proven to be not be too big to fail either.

See also

Will Blockchain Revolutionize The World of Financial Contracts?
Will Fintech Overturn Financial Institutions and Regulations?

Fintech a Massive Market Opportunity For Startups

Friday, July 1st, 2016

When it comes to funding startups, fintech reigns supreme.

In 2015, according to Accenture, global fintech investment reached $22.3 billion (U.S.) — up 75 per cent from $12.7 billion the year before. The rush to develop the alternative, online platforms offering financial services is moving more quickly than many other areas of tech innovation.

Banks and brokerages occupy a central position in every economy. In Europe in 2014, the total assets of the banking sector were €26.8 trillion. In the U.S. in 2015: $15.75 trillion.

Who wouldn’t want a piece of that?

Tech startups have started quietly joining the financial sector with the aim of providing a new world of solutions, including payment and loan services, currency and investment platforms, and wealth management tools. These have been the domain of banks and governments for centuries.

One factor increasing pressure on financial services — and creating big opportunities for startups — is a large wealth transfer happening between the generations.

“There is a $40 trillion intergenerational wealth transfer that is in progress, from a generation that has traditionally relied on an in-person advisor relationship to a generation that expects much more of a technology-augmented experience,” top Vanare executives Richard Cancro and Alexey Sokolin said in a recent Financial Technology Partners report.

This transfer combined with the millennial generation’s expectation of a more technology-augmented experience — which traditional banking providers have been slow to provide — is creating a moneyed user base keen to embrace new approaches to banking.  

While regulations remain a hurdle, particularly in the wake of the 2008-09 global recession, fintech startups are expected to jump through every hurdle required to cater to the coveted millennial demographic, which is expected to make up two-thirds of the global workforce by 2030.

For July, we are exploring the vast market opportunity that is fintech.

Our stories will feature insights from key sector figures such as BMO InvestorLine President Julie Barker-Merz, and Adam Nanjee, head of the fintech division at MaRS.

Watch for our interviews as well as explainers and exclusive entrepreneur profiles, as we explore one of the hottest topics in tech today.

Short-Term and Medium-Term Consequences of Brexit on UK Tech

Wednesday, June 29th, 2016

This piece was originally posted on Medium by William McQuillan and is reproduced here with the author’s permission. 

Technology leaders in the UK were one of the loudest voices speaking out against #Brexit. Multiple polls showed the technology sector strongly in favour of remaining, with only 15% in favour of leaving. Over 60 venture capitalists signed a letter backing to remain, with experienced investors like Robin Klein warning that a Brexit could be a Doomsday for the UK startup ecosystem.

The UK technology sector is growing 34% faster than the rest of the economy, and it has been a huge success in recent years — garnering the UK international attention as technology hub, culminating in large exits and pulling in strong talent from all over the globe.

Maybe we, as the tech community, assumed that the rest of country wanted the same things we did. This is perhaps why the outcome has come as such as a surprise to so many of us — the voices that we were surrounded by were not reflective of a large portion of the UK.

Now that Brexit has happened — should we expect large changes? Is Doomsday coming? Currently, there remains far too many uncertainties and undecided variables to make long term predictions. However, there are some considerations worth taking into account in the short- and medium-term for UK technology startups.

Short-term

Uncertainty is the killer for the short term. With Cameron stepping down, we don’t know who will lead the UK economy. Leaving the EU is a concept  —  how the UK subjectively will do it is still to be decided.

The European Union has become so entrenched in many aspects of the UK financial, regulatory, and legal economy  —  the process to untangle those is still unsure. At the moment, this uncertainty is fueling a lot of the huge movements we are seeing in the equity and currency markets.

During unstable periods, most financial investors will move away from technology startups, who are seen as high-risk. This will make it less appealing for angel and high-net worth individuals to invest until markets have stabilised.

This morning, I’ve received 5+ phone calls from entrepreneurs both in and outside the Frontline portfolio  —  all concerned with how Brexit would affect their current round of funding.

If they are a UK company who is raising in US Dollars  —  that is now a positive for them. If they are a UK company raising in Pounds from international investors  —  that is a positive for their investors. Most technology companies are global companies and most venture capital investors are long-term investors, so something like Brexit should not prevent a deal from closing.

Where this is not true, though, is for any potential M&A activity. Until there is more stability, I expect to see a severe decrease or altogether halt of technology acquisitions in the UK.

In the short-term, folks who are considering joining UK companies from abroad will be less likely to move. Anecdotally, I know two couples (one from the EU, one from the US), both of whom had been planning to join the UK tech sector. Both are now seriously reconsidering whether it is the right place to move now, a lot of their fear powered by uncertainty of the future.

Medium-Term

As markets begin to stabilise, we will see currencies and equities settle — most likely at much lower values than before. This lower-valued pound will mean that UK companies will be less competitive in attracting top talent, one of the most important abilities for fast-growing technology companies.

Free movement of talent is probably one of founders’ biggest worries. Being part of the EU means that a UK company has open access to a talent pool of over 400M people, instead of the mere 60M in the UK. Most likely, the UK will move towards having a relationship with the EU similar to that of Norway. Hopefully, this will mean that trade and immigration will be similar to what it is now.

Depending on how these trade and immigration agreements are made, it could make it significantly less appealing for international companies to have their European HQs in Britain. Many of the largest financials institutions such as HSBC, Barclays, Goldman Sachs, and many others announced prior to the vote that they would be moving large number of employees out of the UK should a Brexit vote occur. Even now, it is being reported that Morgan Stanley already plans on moving 2000 staff to Dublin or Frankfurt.

Some have stepped back on these comments this morning, but I see this as more of a market-calming tactic. I believe that many international companies will look to move operations elsewhere in Europe. This will be equally a problem for the early-stage tech companies based in London/the UK  —  a significant talent drain is never good for the market.

The funding environment for venture capital funds will also be affected. The European Investment Fund is the largest investor in European VC funds and are invested in many UK VCs. If the UK is no longer in the EU, this source of capital will most likely dry up and venture funds will need to seek alternative sources of capital — which is already in short supply. The same will go for the many favourable grants that tech companies receive.

While UK companies will have less capacity to buy foreign companies, they will seem cheaper to international buyers and investors. In the medium-term, this could lead to an uptick in acquisitions or international investments in the UK.

Many other questions remain to be answered: What will happen to UK fintech companies that have EU bank passporting that allows them to operate without obtaining extra banking licenses in other EU countries? Will this lead to London losing it’s fintech crown? How will the digital single market be affected for UK companies?

Currently, London is the centre of the European tech startup ecosystem. However, other European cities will take advantage of these post-Brexit issues. Hubs like Stockholm, Dublin, and Berlin could leverage this uncertainty to attract talent, capital, and companies away from the UK. It could lead to London losing importance in Europe as a tech and startup centre.

As a pan-European investor, today is a sad day for me. However, I hope that this instability is short-lived and that, moving forward, Europe continues to lower barriers for trade and people — so that great companies can continue to grow with as little friction as possible across the continent.

To all ambitious UK-based tech founders, let’s continue to focus on the future — growing your teams, closing your funding rounds, and, as you always do, evolving to tackle any challenge that stands in front of you.

UK Startups Worried About Talent and Funding After Brexit Vote

Friday, June 24th, 2016

After the United Kingdom voted 52% to leave the European Union, the startup community in London and Scotland — both of which voted to remain in the union — has been thrown into turmoil.

Debbie Wosskow, founder of the lobby group Sharing Economy UK, told London tech magazine The Memo: “Make no mistake, the news this morning is seismic. It is disappointing that we are in this situation and there is no doubt that the weeks ahead will be turbulent for many different reasons.”

North of the border in ‘Silicon Glen,’ the situation is much the same. John Peebles, the CEO of Administrate, an Edinburgh-based training management startup with $1.54 million of funding, told The Herald that a great deal of government-backed enterprise funding and talent came from Europe.

The Brexit decision has been disappointing to virtually all Scottish startups, Peebles told TechPORTFOLIO. “We’re in a relatively small market here in Edinburgh, and because there is a lot of activity, many Scottish startups are looking to hire into their team for growth. That’s just become a lot harder, potentially, now that the wider EU may start to require a work visa.”

One feature of the EU is free movement of labor; anybody born on the continent with a European passport can take a job in another European country. Although this is a startup-friendly policy, greatly widening the pool of candidates, Leave leaders campaigned against it.

Fred Destin, partner at venture capital firm Accel, told the Financial Times that the “fluidity, speed and simplicity” of this system was a huge benefit, and that the suggested replacement — a points-style system, like the one used in Canada or Australia — was too cumbersome for small organizations.

Turmoil aside, the European Union itself is keen to push quickly and make the process as fast — if not pain-free — as possible, with the President of the European Parliament looking at legally speeding up the steps, saying that uncertainty is the “opposite of what we need.”

Brexit leaves unresolved issues and no timelines or known conclusions. The labor market and free trade won’t be settled for a long time, and the pound sterling is plummeting.

Some see the final conclusion — when it arrives — as a positive. Jim Duffy, CEO of Entrepreneurial Spark, which describes itself as the UK’s largest free accelerator, says that businesses are trading across the world, not just Europe.

“Entrepreneurs will simply just get on with it and what’s important today is that they continue to focus on planning to ensure that they can navigate any turbulence in the coming days and weeks.”

Peebles agrees. “On the one hand, the instability of Brexit and a potential second independence referendum are unsettling, but on the other hand, we’re lucky that most tech startups are focused on global markets.”

Still, what many are describing as an emotional, ‘lizard-brain’ reaction from the British people is likely to have serious political consequences in the years ahead for the UK and the EU.

https://twitter.com/EdwardTHardy/status/746260079645720576

https://twitter.com/gemmabodinetz/status/746364177099399168

Tech’s Gender Problem Means Money Lost

Monday, June 13th, 2016

Only 17% of Fortune 500 CIOs are women, according to data released this year by the National Center for Women and Information Technology. The stat is roughly in line with a 2014 study showing that women account for only 11% of executive positions at top Silicon Valley companies.

While Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg and HP CEO Meg Whitman are well known, the overall lack of female founders, executives, and venture capitalists limits the value of the tech sector.

Female entrepreneurs generate 20 percent greater revenue than their male counterparts, while receiving 50 percent less VC funding, according to a 2012 report in Harvard Business Review, citing Kauffman Foundation data.

Explanations for the under-representation of women in tech abound. Some cite an over-reliance by VCs on existing networks, who are mostly male. Others bring the problem back to elementary and secondary education, when girls may get less encouragement in STEM courses.

Whatever the case, the under-representation of women is an economic detriment, regardless of the industry.

$28 Trillion

A recent McKinsey report stated: “In a ‘full potential’ scenario in which women play an identical role in labor markets to that of men, as much as $28 trillion, or 26 percent, could be added to global annual GDP by 2025.”

Given the numbers, gender equality should be a funding priority in tech ecosystems across the world. So why isn’t it?

Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist, argues that venture capitalists in tech ecosystems are not putting their money where their mouths are, citing issues such as a lack of female-led startups when the data doesn’t support those claims.

Though acknowledging the true problems is an important first step, systemic, measurable changes are needed: from STEM education, to recruitment processes, to funding. Otherwise, we hinder both social and economic progress.

US Postal Service Considers Adopting Digital Currency

Tuesday, May 31st, 2016

You’d expect the likes of Nasdaq and Goldman Sachs to already be part way to adopting digital currency. But the US Postal Service is also eyeing the technology, known as the blockchain, as a way to reinforce its supply chains and grow its share of the financial services market.

The blockchain differs from the traditional banking record in that all financial transaction data are contained in a distributed ledger. This removes the centre of power from individual banks, and vastly increases security as multiple copies of a ledger where one entry depends on another (the “chain” in the blockchain) cannot be interfered with after they are filed.

According to CoinDesk, the Postal Service’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report that says ‘PostCoin’–either adopted from an established cryptocurrency or created by the government agency itself–could be used by customers to send international money transfers to a far larger number of places than its currently limited scope.

Blockchain technology could even be connected to pieces of mail for supply chain management, for “timely sharing of information and processing of payments”: while the report acknowledges that it may be somewhat impractical to attach a unique sensor to every single item of mail, the USPS could use its size to encourage adoption.

Randy Miskanic, the US Postal Service’s Chief Information Security Officer and VP of Digital Solutions, is urging caution because of security and regulatory uncertainty. This means there might not be a PostCoin particularly soon.

“We will evaluate the use of blockchain for each of the use cases and further review the available opportunities while considering the impact of the technology and financial restrictions,” he says.

[scribd id=313629809 key=key-62gxYbAtPUKUJ4nrie5T mode=scroll]

Toronto Diversity Strengthens the “Cockroach Nest”

Wednesday, May 25th, 2016

Toronto was recently named the most diverse city in the world, and this status might help to explain the success of companies like Wattpad and other startups that have helped form the city’s cockroach nest.

A study by the BBC says that while Dubai has 83% of its population hailing from abroad, Toronto has a far wider spread of nationalities – 230 in all – so wide that it took one artist a year to find and photograph one person from each of these countries.

techPortfolio_Quote_May_24

Why Diversity Matters, a report by management consulting firm McKinsey & Co. reveals a strong correlation between diversity and financial success: companies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity are 35% more likely to have above average returns.

Chris Arsenault, managing partner at iNovia Capital, says that companies that prize diversity within their own culture make better hires and have more fully engaged employees.

“As a diverse workforce understands and relates to its customer base, it can also serve to drive innovation, being better equipped to design and develop products and services that meet the needs of a diverse market,” he adds.

techPortfolio_Fact_May_24

WattPad, a Toronto-based community publishing and e-book distribution platform, is following that exact strategy.

“The majority of Wattpad employees can speak a second or third language,” the company’s founder, Allen Lau, explains in a Globe and Mail editorial. “They are world travellers, having lived in 76 different cities around the world. Many are immigrants or first-generation Canadians. The perspective they bring is invaluable.”

WattPad’s initial growth in English only was slow, but when he started hiring country managers who could not only translate language but understand cultural norms, he was able to expand and adapt his product, tailoring it to content creators depending on nationality. This has resulted, for instance, in WattPad stories being adapted for Filipino media.

 

 

“I believe that Toronto’s diversity gives me an unfair advantage,” says Lau.

“Local startups are now global on day one,” adds Dr. Sean Wise, Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship at the Ted Rogers School of Management.  “Not only does diversity lead to innovation through an exchange of ideas, diversity can allow you to go global.”

For more on the opportunities and challenges facing Toronto as a tech startup ecosystem, read our in-depth analysis, Shopify Takes Vacant Blackberry Throne – And What’s Next for Ontario.

VIDEO: IBM’s Ontario Research Consortium Partnership

Tuesday, May 24th, 2016

IBM provided a $200+ million “sandbox” and access to the country’s biggest supercomputer, along with an abundance of analytical tools as the company’s contribution to Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform (SOSCIP), a research and development consortium that now includes 14 universities and 2 colleges.

The result? The partnership has generated $2 billion in pipeline revenue by helping university researchers and startups get to market.

This innovation model, facilitating collaboration between IBM, academic institutions, Ontario Centre of Excellence, and SMEs aims to help establish Ontario as a leading global centre for driving innovation in information technology, health, and urban infrastructure (water, energy, transportation).

By partnering with private enterprise, academic institutions can leverage cutting-edge technology and experience.

“Silicon Forest” Attracts Talent from the Mother of all Tech Ecosystems

Thursday, May 19th, 2016

Tech disruption happens geographically as much as it happens across industries.

Portland, now known in the tech community as “Silicon Forest,” is becoming a big draw for developers as Bay Area high rents make Silicon Valley – arguably the most hallowed of startup ecosystems – less attractive.

As an indication of the trend, the region’s talent pool grew 28 percent between 2010 and 2013, compared to 20.8 percent in Silicon Valley.

Pacific Northwest Benefits

Portland’s affordability is major factor behind the growth experienced in the high tech sector, and resulting increased salaries are contributing back to the city’s wealth. And this benefits the U.S. Pacific Northwest as a whole.

While prospective migrants are attracted to the low cost of living and work-life balance offered by the region, Portland and Seattle, it’s neighbor to the north, are benefitting from employee exits at tech giants.

A tech ecosystem map from Madrona Venture Capital demonstrates how the University of Washington, Amazon, Microsoft and other notable contributors to the ecosystem have spurred the creation of startups, including now established Real Networks and Expedia.

With Google setting up a larger office space in Portland, this trend should continue to bolster the region’s startup prowess and ability to compete with other tech ecosystems around the world.

 

Choosing the Wrong Accelerator Can Get You Nowhere Fast

Wednesday, May 18th, 2016

Accelerators can put startups on a fast track towards growth-stage success, but founders shouldn’t be tempted to apply to a program simply on the basis of acceptance chances. Geography, funding, office space, and mentorship availability are all important, and there are still other factors to keep in mind.

We asked interviewees during our launch week about what’s most crucial for startup founders considering accelerators.

“It is very important to get the right accelerator based on the product that you have,” says Amir Azhari, President and COO of AOMS Technologies, a startup focused on fibre optic sensors for extreme environments such as oil and natural gas wells. The first accelerator he tried, which focused on software and app development, wasn’t meeting his needs.

techPortfolio_Quote_May_17

Azhari joined the RIC Centre, in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, which he says worked better because of its manufacturing focus.“[They] introduced us to different potential investors who might be interested in our technology,” he says.

Sonia Strimban, Manager of Venture Operations at the MaRS Discovery District in Toronto, adds that accelerators help avoid isolation. “There’s a compounding network effect. If you’re not part, you’re missing out in introductions and meetings with potential investors. You have to be part of the community to receive the exponential effects of the momentum.”

Matt Roberts, associate director at the Business Development Bank of Canada’s IT Venture Fund, agrees that accelerators provide an important role, particularly with filling missing skills in your initial team. “They’re more often than not providing advice and feedback to allow founders to do some of that early sales and marketing themselves, or giving them advice and connections to make the first hires they need.”

But perhaps the best value you can get out of an accelerator is working with those already established. According to Strimban: “Founders like to learn from each other. There’s an element of trust they have with other entrepreneurs… It’s invaluable knowledge that will save you so much time and effort if you can benefit from the experience of others.”

/newsrooms Launches TechPORTFOLIO to Cover Economic Value of Startup Ecosystems

Monday, May 16th, 2016

Startups have ended the industrial era and have become the net job creators in many major markets across the globe.

To follow this disruptive change, /newsrooms has launched TechPORTFOLIO, a social media-driven destination that covers the economic value and financial benefit of startup ecosystems as they emerge locally, nationally and internationally.

TechPORTFOLIO will explore the most important transformations impacting technology, business and economic growth,” says Robert Delaney, VP Managing Editor, TechPORTFOLIO. “We’re researching and writing about many layers of the ecosystems. TechPORTFOLIO will compare and contrast geographies, approaches, companies, and investment trends in order to understand and evaluate how startup ecosystems are changing.”

TechPORTFOLIO combines journalistic coverage and data analysis to profile startups, entrepreneurs, investors, academia and governments shaping startup ecosystems.

TechPORTFOLIO will use IBM Cloud and cognitive technologies, including data and machine learning, as part of its journalistic approach to deliver insights relevant to the companies, startups and governments involved in the global startup ecosystem.

“IBM Cloud is the leading platform for data-driven cloud and analytics that enables organizations to meet market demands and open doors to more responsive and innovative ways of doing business,”says Nevil Knupp, VP of Cloud, IBM Canada. “By providing the best cloud and cognitive technologies, we are helping TechPORTFOLIO connect to the developer and startup audience and transform the way news is delivered.”

“The Canadian startup space is thriving and supporting a culture of innovation with organizations, like TechPORTFOLIO, allows IBM to contribute to a thriving tech environment that can strengthen Canada’s position as an ideal place to research and develop new technologies,” says Lila Adamec, Program Director, Developer Ecosystem & Startups, IBM Canada.

TechPORTFOLIO will be a new kind of publication that incorporates data, social media and technology into its operating model and ongoing publishing,” says Leigh Doyle, Managing Editor, TechPORTFOLIO. “Editorial instinct and subject matter expertise will take us a long way in our analysis and storytelling around tech and startup ecosystems. When we combine those with our data and social media expertise, we’re able to go deep into subjects in ways that were not possible before. That’s exciting.”

About TechPORTFOLIO:

TechPORTFOLIO covers the economic value and financial benefit of startup ecosystems as they emerge locally, nationally, and internationally. TechPORTFOLIO combines journalistic coverage, data analysis, and profiles startups, entrepreneurs, investors, academia and governments shaping startup ecosystems. The site is available at https://techportfolio.net/

TechPORTFOLIO is owned and published by /newsrooms, a network dedicated to providing continuous content marketing and social media coverage for brands. Our managing editors, writers, correspondents, creative producers and analysts draw from the insights and experience of the world’s best newsrooms to deliver content and coverage across a wide range of industry categories.

Toronto is a Cockroach Nest

Sunday, May 1st, 2016

The University of Toronto and RBC recently announced ONRamp, an initiative that will include a startup incubator meant to help entrepreneurs network with investors and each other. ONRamp’s RBC Innovation Hub is the newest among many multilaterally funded programs meant to help startups in a city endowed with world-class academic and financial resources.  

Toronto distinguishes itself as Canada’s financial center, the fourth-largest metropolis in North America, and its namesake university ranks in the world’s top-20. Toronto is also one of the most ethnically diverse cities in the world, a metric that McKinsey & Co. says supports corporate success.

So where are the Toronto-bred unicorns?

techPortfolio_Serbinis_Quote_May_2_1

Ranked 17 in the 2015 Global Startup Ecosystem Report by Compass, Toronto has yet to produce a pre-IPO company valued at $1 billion or more. There’s no unicorn pasture in Toronto; it’s more of a “cockroach” nest. But given the shift away from frenzied VC funding of any startup that grew its user base, this might be a good thing.

Toronto’s Flixel exemplifies the cockroach, a moniker for startups that prioritize revenues over users when it comes to growth. Others include UberFlip and Wattpad. The city has also produced a number of reputable exits, including Kobo, which was bought by Japan’s Ratuken for $315 million, XE.com, and VerticalScope.

“It’s about shots on net, and muscling the good shots through i.e. you need a healthy number of seed/A stage companies, and when it comes to scaling you need growth capital,” says Kobo’s founder Michael Serbinis. “Toronto-Waterloo has the former now, but there are few funds here that can write big, later stage cheques.”

Serbinis currently serves as board director for the Toronto-based MaRS Discovery District, an innovation hub that connects startups with investors and corporations and is a founder of LEAGUE, a personal health management platform.

Endangered Species

If VC funding in the first quarter of 2016 is any indication of what’s in store for startups this year, unicorns are becoming an endangered species. KPMG’s latest Venture Pulse report noted that the first quarter of 2016 saw $25.5 billion invested across 1,829 deals, marking the second-straight quarter in which investors dialed back VC funding and activity.

Only 5 new unicorns were minted world-wide in the first quarter of 2016. By comparison, the fourth quarter of 2015 produced 13, while the second and third quarter each produced 25.

techPortfolio_Quote_April_29_1 (2)

Mark Skapinker, co-founder and managing partner at  Brightspark Ventures, says: “If you look at locations outside of Silicon Valley that have had huge successful companies, it is quite devastating to the surrounding market if they fail at a later stage [like] Nortel in Ottawa, Nokia in Sweden, Blackberry in Waterloo. So, having a unicorn is not always amazing for a city.”

The tougher funding environment will play to Canada’s strengths. The country’s banking system withstood the global financial crisis that began in 2008 while U.S. financial institutions went bust or survived on government support. However, the robust regulatory regime that kept Canada strong throughout the turmoil is a reflection of the conservatism that makes it difficult for all but the most self-sufficient startups – cockroaches, in other words – to get funded.

“Toronto does have a number of cockroach-type companies,” Skapinker said. “It is much harder to get funded in Toronto than somewhere like Silicon Valley and we have a [startup financing] infrastructure that is not very ‘robust’ so companies need to work much harder and be ready for hard times at every stage. That makes them ‘cockroach’ like.”

 

The Downside of Jobs in the Startup Era

Wednesday, April 27th, 2016

Enthusiasm over the economic benefit of tech startups needs some grounding, particularly when it comes to jobs.

While we argue in TechPORTFOLIO that startups have ended the industrial era, we should also acknowledge that many of the jobs startups create are fleeting and short on benefits. Moreover, the sheer number of traditional jobs in industries that grew throughout the 20th century make them a vital component of most economies even if their numbers are in decline.

The following stats help put the importance of startups as employment drivers into perspective:

Startups can create a large number of jobs, but can also lose a large number too.

In a 2015 study, Stanford Graduate School of Business professor George Foster examined more than 158,000 startups across the world, looking at each for five years. He found that jobs shed by companies in their fifth year equal 65 percent of that year’s new hires. This number, which shows the difficulty many companies have transitioning out of their startup phase, doesn’t account for jobs shed by startups that go bust. Nor does it count jobs lost as a result of startups disrupting a traditional industry.

techPortfolio_Quote_1_April 27 (2)

In years three, four, and five, only 8 percent added new jobs. Foster shows startup job graphs less like a slapshot — with rapid year-on-year growth starting from zero – and more like “a high-speed game of snakes and ladders.”

A minority of startups account for the majority of startup revenue and job creation.

The Stanford study also shows that among five-year-old companies, the most successful 10 percent account for 80 percent of revenue and job creation. That successful 10 percent also accounts for a lot of job loss, because companies can only lose money and jobs if they make it in the first place.

Though startups are creating jobs, companies like Google and Amazon aren’t even among the top 50 largest U.S. employers.

As Tech Republic notes, tech giants like Google and Amazon touch many facets of our lives, however they don’t come even close to companies like Wal-Mart (2.2 million employees in 2015), McDonald’s (420,000 employees in 2015) and Home Depot (371,000 employees in 2015) in job creation.

Less than 1% of the U.S. labour force is employed in companies established after 2000.

In a study by Oxford economists Thor Berger and Carl Benedikt Frey cited by Re/code, startups aren’t necessarily the job-creation engines they’re supposed to be. While IBM employs more than 400,000 people, Facebook has barely  7,000 employees. Part of the reason startups don’t hire as many people is because they often have software taking care of many human tasks.

According to a prediction by Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne from Oxford Martin School & Faculty of Philosophy in the UK, “47 percent of total US employment is in the high risk category, meaning that associated occupations are potentially automatable over some unspecified number of years, perhaps a decade or two.”

Startup jobs are often riskier to take than a job at a mid-size or large firm.

According to a 2014 Robert Half Technology survey of 2,300 IT professionals, a combined 84 percent said they would prefer to work at a mid-size or large firm. As Sarah McMullin of Camino Information Services explains in an article for Monster, one can expect lower pay, fewer benefits, and working longer hours. Startup employees are often on their own in saving for retirement.

But, you won’t find job prospects improving in the industrial sector.

For the past decade, growth in the U.S. industrial sector has lagged its average growth rate tracked since 1920. Growth topped the historic average of 3.79 percent in only 15 out of 120 months ending March 2016, and has been in negative territory since August 2015, according to U.S. Federal Reserve data. Industrial output in China, Europe and other regions has either seen declining growth rates, or outright decline.

techPortfolio_Fact_April_27

The factors behind these numbers, including slower population growth, make it unlikely that industrial production will return to robust increases seen in earlier decades. Bring automation into the equation, and prospects for well-paying, full-time jobs with full benefits in the industrial sector weaken further.

While tech startup jobs still only account for a small portion of the labor pool, and might not offer the ideal in terms of job security and benefits, they will only grow relative to employment in the industrial sector.

Moreover, as technology developed by startups continues to occupy larger areas of our lives – from social networking to environmental remediation – jobs associated with these companies will become as important as assembly line work from a century ago, if not more.  

 

VOX: Non-compete Enforcement Hobbles Tech Ecosystems

Tuesday, April 19th, 2016

Silicon Valley has soared on the strength of tech innovation while the “Massachusetts miracle” fizzled, Vox writes, in a piece that analyses how non-compete agreements in employment contracts have affected tech startup ecosystems.

California has gone further than other states to nullify such clauses. They’re not just void in the sunshine state; employers can be held liable for refusing to hire someone for not agreeing to sign one. The unfettered job-hopping freedom that results has helped to support companies like Intel, Tesla and YouTube.

In contrast, Boston-area ventures Digital Equipment Corporation and Wang Laboratories, behemoths in their day, are gone. (You might want to keep the volume down when you hit the Wang Labs link.)

However, the Bay area’s edge may get blunted.  

“Most states have laws like Massachusetts, and recently policymakers from Massachusetts to Hawaii have been considering reforms to noncompete agreements,” Vox says.

That might give Boston, as well as other areas boasting institutional strength in academia and venture capital, a chance to catch up.

Smart Cities Take Root in Canada as Apps Learn to Improve Services

Friday, April 15th, 2016

In 2014 the City of Surrey, B.C. launched Surrey Request, an app developed to field requests for service, including waste collection and road repair. The result? The city saves as much as $91,875 each year, a figure that’s expected to increase as residents acclimate to the automated service.

According to Sean Simpson, Surrey’s Director, Information Technology, in-person requests cost the city $9 per transaction while a phone calls cost $4.50. In contrast, a request sent through Surrey Request costs as little as $0.25. The self-serve channel now handles 15 percent of the 70,000 requests it receives annually.

Surrey took its smart city initiatives a step further when they partnered with tech startup Purple Forge last year to pilot the company’s Powered by IBM Watson solution. Available through the ‘My Surrey’ mobile and web apps that residents use to gather city information, including government services and job opportunities, the solution will further reduce Surrey’s reliance on telephone-based services.

The app uses IBM Watson’s advanced cognitive and natural language capabilities to answer residents’ questions about city services. Now, Surrey residents can hit the app and ask it, for example, how to contact animal control in the event that a cougar wanders into someone’s back yard. My Surrey will then reply with an email address and a phone number.

Building Entrepreneurs

The drive to make cities smart provides more than just faster answers to questions about municipal services. It gives entrepreneurs responding to the demand the opportunity to create solutions that can be commercialized. This ultimately builds the depth and breadth of startup ecosystems because the solutions that get deployed in smart city initiatives can often be adapted for other applications.

The concept of ‘smart cities’ has gained traction since the 90s with the rise of Information Computer Technology (ICT). In an interview with Wired, Gerhard Schmitt, professor of information architecture, and leader of the ETH Future Cities Laboratory in Singapore, said cities are “limited to technical data sensor inputs, control systems, apps”. To be ‘smart’, “cities need to be responsive this is a human-focused approach, where citizens can give feedback on the functioning of the city to those who run it.”

Working closely with multinational corporations, academic institutions, and tech startups in its top-20 ranked tech ecosystem, Singapore is taking a holistic approach to solving complex problems like urban density, energy sustainability, healthcare, mobility, and more, by leveraging technology.

“Technology builds its knowledge”

Given that 50 to 80 percent of requests submitted to service centers are for common questions, and apps like My Surrey can provide a potential savings of $4 to $6 per call, cities switching to smart solutions can improve their bottom lines. In a press release from Purple Forge, Councillor Bruce Hayne, Chair of Innovation & Investment Committee stated that “IBM Watson’s learning abilities are such that the technology builds its knowledge and improves as citizens use it.”

My Surrey is one of several IBM Watson-powered smart city initiatives in Canada. As cities transition to smart initiatives, measuring a city’s IQ, developing ‘telepathic cities’, and building ‘smart nations’, may become the norm.

iphone1

Tech startups like Purple Forge have recognized that multiple opportunities leveraging their own IP exist within the public and private sectors. The company’s clients include five municipalities in the U.S. and Canada, as well as hospitals such as Norfolk General Hospital and industry associations including the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries.  

Many Canadian cities are struggling with strained budgets as prices and demand for energy products fall, making more people dependent on provincial or municipal programs. As savings allow cities to divert funds to other priorities, and as the learning abilities of smart city apps improve the experience for users, smart technologies are likely to become more of a necessity than a nice-to-have.

Other Canadian startups pursuing smart city initiatives include Toronto-based Drven, and Kitchener-Waterloo based Miovision, which launched Spectrum, an app that sends messages to technicians if a traffic cabinet problem occurs.

What Matters for Startups in Social Media and IRL: Funding

Thursday, March 31st, 2016

For startups in Canada, raising capital is a major talking point both in social media and in the real world.

A funding roadshow and an article by BDC’s Matt Roberts on the current state of VC investments show up prominently as key topics of the current startup ecosystem social media conversation in Canada.

Over the past three months, the conversation has been active and diverse with 1,067 tweets from 636 accounts, and a combined reach of 5.1 million potential impressions.

Here’s what it looks like: 

techPortolio_chiclet_Cloud1 - April20 - Chiclet 1 (1)

The Fundica Roadshow appears near the center of the word cloud as people attending the event have shared actively in social media. The roadshow is a Canadian initiative by Montreal-based financial services company, Fundica. With stops in 10 Canadian cities between February and May, the event aims to “to educate entrepreneurs on funding opportunities and facilitate connections between funders and startups.”   

BDC’s associate director of venture capital Matt Roberts is another large term in the word cloud. Roberts sparked social media activity and conversation with this post:

In the post, he says 2016 won’t be as good as 2015 when it comes to funding for Canadian tech companies. The key issue? “The collapse of the Canadian Dollar, hitting a low that hasn’t been seen since the 2003,” he writes, which will impact talent and venture capital funding.

One of the most retweeted pieces of content in the conversation was from the Feb 23 launch of the City of Toronto’s #StartUpHereTo project, which aims to create awareness of, and support, Toronto’s startup ecosystem.

Capturing Canadian entrepreneur stories also emerged as a popular part of the conversation. Another top retweeted message was about Startup North’s entrepreneur survey.

The top shared articles in the startup ecosystem conversation online include:

Incubator Connects Startups to AI

Thursday, March 31st, 2016

Qualified Ontario tech startups hope to benefit from a new public-private sector funding program meant to help them use advanced computing technologies including artificial intelligence to grow their businesses. The program is part of the province’s efforts to create jobs and foster the development of globally competitive technologies.

The new IBM Innovation Incubator Initiative, largely funded by the Ontario government’s Ontario Centres of Excellence (OCE) and technology giant IBM, is expected to support about 500 small and medium-sized companies in the province. Ontario is putting up $22.75 million (Canadian) through the “Strategic Partnerships Stream” from its Jobs and Prosperity Fund, while IBM is contributing $24.75 million. Another $7 million will come from industry contributions, according to OCE, which says the money is expected to generate more than $410 million in private sector investment and create up to 2,600 jobs.

i3_ontario_ibm_2

Life Saving Data

One business hoping to benefit is LifeLearn Inc., a Guelph, Ontario-based software company that provides veterinarians with instant access to medical research and information to better treat their furry patients. The platform, called Sofie, is powered by IBM Watson, an artificial intelligence system that uses natural-language processing and machine learning to derive insights from large amounts of unstructured data.

“A lot of startup entrepreneurs don’t necessarily have the background to develop really articulate business plans, so it’s hard to get funding,” LifeLearn president and CEO JamesCarroll says. “It boils down to access to capital to accelerate the growth process.”

LifeLearn sales have grown 30% annually over the past three years, and the company has added 24 jobs since it entered into a partnership with IBM in 2014, for a total of 64 positions today, according to Carroll.

Future With AI

While that’s already impressive, “If we had access to something like the [IBM Innovation Incubator Initiative] back then, we could have scaled that in 30 or 40 percent of the time,” Carroll says. That includes commercializing the product sooner and hiring even more staff.

“We have some pretty lofty goals with our Watson application,” says Carroll. One is to enable the Sofie program to interpret medical images, and not just text, as it does today.

With programs like the IBM initiative, Ontario hopes ventures like Carroll’s will scale up faster and strengthen its attractiveness to startup entrepreneurs and investors.

The Strategic Partnerships Stream of Ontario’s Jobs and Prosperity Fund promotes “enabling technologies” in sectors that include life sciences, financial services, information/communication, aerospace, and clean tech.